Smith v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Jennifer Lee Smith
Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Case Number: 5:2019cv00061
Filed: February 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Danny C Reeves
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: It is ORDERED as follows: 1. NLT 30 days from the date of entry of this order, parties shall conduct meeting of parties to discuss the possibilities of prompt settlement or resolution of the case and to develop a proposed discovery plan; 2. At the meeting, counsel for the parties shall exchange the disclosures and, in the future, make supplemental disclosures when required; 3. NLT 10 days after meeting, the parties shall file a joint written report outlining the proposed discovery plan. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 4/10/19. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form)(JLM)cc: COR
April 9, 2019 Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company.(Wahlheim, William)
March 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: It is ORDERED that the parties' #5 Proposed Agreed Order, docketed as a motions is GRANTED. Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company shall served a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint no later than 4/9/2019. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 3/19/2019.(KM)cc: COR
March 19, 2019 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Danny C. Reeves for review: re #5 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation For Extension of Responsive Pleading Deadline by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (KJR)
March 18, 2019 Filing 6 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Wahlheim, William)
March 18, 2019 Filing 5 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation For Extension of Responsive Pleading Deadline by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Wahlheim, William)
February 27, 2019 Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Civil Summons and Complaint served on Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company on 2/26/2019, filed by Jennifer Lee Smith. (Shelton, Rachel)
February 21, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically (JLM)
February 21, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4291586), filed by Jennifer Lee Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(JLM)
February 21, 2019 Conflict Check run. (JLM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Represented By: William B. Wahlheim, Jr.
Represented By: Grace R. Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Lee Smith
Represented By: William Nicholas Wallingford
Represented By: Rachel A. Shelton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?