Price v. Fayette District Court et al
| Christopher Clay Price |
| Fayette District Court and Judge Thornton |
| 5:2019cv00069 |
| February 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Karen K Caldwell |
| P SO |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: It is ORDERED that: 1. Price's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #1 is DENIED as premature; and 2. This action is STRICKEN from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 3/11/2019.(KM)cc: COR, Pltf via U.S. mail
|
| Filing 3 Letter from Deputy Clerk mailed to plaintiff advising him that the Court is holding his IFP motion pending receipt of his complaint. (JLM) |
| Filing 2 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Caption page)(JLM) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Clay Price,pro se. Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 envelope postmarked 2/22/19)(JLM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
