Chatfield v. Lexington Fayette Urban County Government
Plaintiff: Rausel Lincoln Chatfield
Defendant: Lexington Fayette Urban County Government
Case Number: 5:2019cv00258
Filed: June 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Claria Horn Boom
Referring Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2019 Filing 7 JUDGMENT: 1. Plaintiff Rausel Lincoln Chatfields #1 Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. This action is STRICKEN from the Courts docket. 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment, and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 7/18/2019.(JJ)cc: Pro Se pltf via US Mail
July 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: 1. Plaintiff's #1 Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. This action is STRICKEN from the Court's docket. 3. The Court will enter an appropriate Judgment. Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 7/18/2019.(JJ)cc: Pro Se Pltf via US Mail
June 28, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING Exhibit E to Complaint by Rausel Lincoln Chatfield, pro se, re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope - Post marked 6/25/19)(JJ)
June 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER re: Disclosure of Contact Information: 1. pro se litigants must provide current telephone number, residential address, & if different, mailing address. 2. pro se litigants must provide written notice of change of residential address, & if different, mailing address. 3. Clerk file copy of Order in all non-prisoner pro se actions. Failure to provide required information or change of address may result in appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell (SLH)cc: COR
June 24, 2019 Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 sample caption)(SLH)
June 24, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED). ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 5027847), filed by Rausel Lincoln Chatfield. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit A- Email correspondence, #3 Exhibit A1-Comments exhibit form FCBA, #4 Exhibit E and F- Copy of probate filing, #5 Exhibit G- Corrections to newspaper, #6 Receipt)(SLH) Modified text on 6/24/2019 (SLH). (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/28/2019: #7 Exhibit E - Enewspapaer Link) (JJ).
June 24, 2019 Conflict Check run. (SLH)
June 24, 2019 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: #1 Complaint, (SLH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chatfield v. Lexington Fayette Urban County Government
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lexington Fayette Urban County Government
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rausel Lincoln Chatfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?