Cox v. Bureau of Prisons
Martin Cox |
Bureau of Prisons |
5:2019cv00328 |
August 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Danny C Reeves |
P SO |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 USCA Case Number 19-5966 Case Manager Amy Gigliotti for #9 Notice of Appeal filed by Martin Cox. (KJR) |
Filing 12 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Martin Cox, pro se. (GLD) |
Filing 11 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT of #9 REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by Martin Cox.pro se. (Attachments: #1 Envelope postmarked 8/23/19)(GLD) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: #12 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement, #11 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT (GLD) |
Filing 10 ORDER: 1. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff may proceed as a pauper on appeal. 2. Court waives collection of initial partial appellate filing fee. 3. Clerk shall open account in Cox's name for receipt of $505 appellate filing fee. Clerk shall complete EDKY 525 Form with (a) Cox's name, (b) inmate registration number, and (c) case number. Clerk shall send copy of this order and notice of payment form to Warden of institution. 4. Each month, Cox's custodian shall send Clerk payment equal to 20% of Cox's income for preceding month, only if monthly payment in Cox's account exceeds $10. Continue payments until $505 appellate filing fee is paid. 5. Clerk shall send copy of this Order to 6CCA.. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 8/27/2019. (Attachments: #1 EDKY Form 525)(GLD)cc: COR,Pro Se Plaintiff, Warden w/EDKY Form 525, 6CCA, Finance. Modified on 8/29/2019 (GLD). |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #8 Judgment, by Martin Cox, pro se.( A copy of the docket sheet and NOA has been mailed to the party). cc: COR, 6CCA (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Post marked 08/22/2019)(MDC) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #9 Notice of Appeal (MDC) |
Filing 8 JUDGMENT: 1. Plaintiff Martin Cox's FOIA claim #1 is DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. The remainder of this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 8/14/2019.(STC)cc: Plt |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM ORDER: 1. Cox's FOIA claim #1 is DISMISSED with prejudice. This Memorandum Order does not address the potential merit of any Eighth Amendment or due process claims. 2. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 8/14/2019.(STC)cc: Plt |
Filing 6 ORDER: 1. Cox's #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Payment of the $50.00 administrative fee is WAIVED. However, Cox must pay the $350.00 filing fee in the manner set forth below. 2. Clerk shall open an account in Cox's name for receipt of filing fee. The Clerk shall complete a Notice of Payment Form [E.D. Ky. 525 Form] with: (a) Cox's name, (b) his inmate registration number, and (c) this case number. The Clerk shall then send a copy of this Order and the Notice of Payment Form to the Warden of the institution in which Cox is currently confined. 3. Cox's custodian shall send the Clerk a payment each month from Cox's inmate trust fund account. This payment should equal to 20% of Cox's income from the preceding month. However, the custodian shall only send a monthly payment if the amount in Cox's account exceeds $10.00. Custodian shall continue the monthly payments until Cox's entire $350.00 filing fee is paid. 4. This matter stands submitted for initial screening. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 8/14/2019. (Attachments: #1 EDKy 525) (STC)cc: Plt,Warden |
Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption) (MDC) |
Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Martin Cox. (MDC) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Martin Cox Motions referred to P SO. (MDC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT referred to Judge, filed by Martin Cox. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Post mark unreadable)(MDC) |
Conflict Check run. (MDC) |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Martin Cox. (MDC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cox v. Bureau of Prisons | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Bureau of Prisons | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Martin Cox | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.