Carter v. Eastern District Court of Kentucky Central Division of Lexington
| Paul Lee Carter, Jr |
| Eastern District Court of Kentucky Central Division of Lexington |
| 5:2019cv00404 |
| October 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Danny C Reeves |
| P SO |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT: ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: (1) Pla Paul Lee Carter, Jr.'s #1 Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. (2) This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 10/03/2019.(MDC) cc: COR; Pla via US Mail.
|
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) Carters' #1 Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. (2) All pending motions are DENIED as moot. (3) This matter is STRICKEN from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 10/03/2019.(MDC)cc: COR, Pla via US mail.
|
| Filing 6 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(MDC) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Receive ten million that was award from the United States Court at Lexington by Paul Lee Carter, Jr., Pro Se. Motions referred to P SO. (MDC) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Receive Justice from the United States District Court at Lexington by Paul Lee Carter, Jr, Pro Se. Motions referred to P SO. (MDC) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Paul Lee Carter, Jr Motions referred to P SO. (MDC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED), filed by Paul Lee Carter, Jr., Pro Se. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Miscellaneous; CD - maintained in the Clerk's Office)(MDC). |
| Conflict Check run. (MDC) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of P SO for review: re #5 MOTION to Receive ten million by Paul Lee Carter, Jr, Pro Se #4 Motion to Receive Justice from US District Court by Paul Lee Carter, Jr., Pro Se #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Paul Lee Carter, Jr. (MDC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Carter v. Eastern District Court of Kentucky Central Division of Lexington | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Eastern District Court of Kentucky Central Division of Lexington | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Paul Lee Carter, Jr | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
