Tucker v. Quintana
| Percy James Tucker |
| Mr. Quintana |
| 5:2019cv00430 |
| October 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| William O Bertelsman |
| P SO |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: The Court DENIES Tucker's #7 Motion for Reconsideration; 2. The Clerk of the court shall send Tucker blank copies to the Court's form Civil Right Complaint; Application to Proceeding Without Prepayment of Fees & Affidavit, and Certificate of Inmate Account. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 11/13/2019. (KM)cc: COR, Tucker via U.S. mail with Forms
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration re #6 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief by Percy James Tucker (pro se)(Attachments: #1 Envelope postmarked 11/7/2019)(SLH) Modified text on 11/12/2019 (SLH) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge William O. Bertelsman for review: re #7 MOTION for Reconsideration re #6 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief by Percy James Tucker (pro se) (SLH) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: denying #5 Motion for Release from SHU for Just Cause. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 11/6/2019. (STC)cc: Plt
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Release from SHU for Just Cause by Percy James Tucker, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Postmarked Oct 2019 (specific date illegible))(STC) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: re #5 MOTION for Release from SHU for Just Cause by Percy James Tucker (STC) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: 1. Court DENIES Percy Tucker's petition for writ of habeas corpus #1 . 2. Action is DISMISSED AND STRICKEN from Court's docket. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 10/29/2019.(GLD)cc: Pro se petitioner
|
| Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(STC) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Percy James Tucker, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Administrative Remedy, #2 Envelope postmarked 10 23 2019)(STC) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. No filing fee received. (STC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tucker v. Quintana | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Mr. Quintana | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Percy James Tucker | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
