Young v. Quintana
Kori Michael Young |
Warden Quintana |
5:2019cv00467 |
November 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
P SO |
Henry R Wilhoit |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT to Respondent Warden Quintana re #5 Order. (MDC) |
Filing 8 ORDER: It is ORDERED that: 1) Young's #7 Motion for an Order clarifying sentence is DENIED. 2) At this point, the next step in the litigation is for the Respondent to file his response to Young's habeas petition. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 12/10/2019. (MDC) cc: COR; Young via US Mail |
Filing 7 MOTION for an Order of Clarifying Sentence by Kori Michael Young, Pro Se. Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 Letter from US Probation Office, #2 Order from US Distr Court for the EDMi on a Motion for Clarifying Sentence, #3 Envelope postmarked 12/03/2019)(MDC) |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #7 MOTION for an Order of Clarifying Sentence by Kori Michael Young, Pro Se. (MDC) |
Filing 6 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT to US Attorney's Office re #5 Order. (MDC) |
Filing 5 ORDER: It is ORDERED as follows: 1) The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of the petition and this Order by certified mail to both Respondent Francisco Quintana, and the US Atty for the EDKY. 2) W/in 60 days from the entry of this Order, Respondent shall file a response to the petition. 3) Young must keep the Court apprised of any change in his address. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 12/03/2019. (MDC) cc: Young via US Mail; Petition + Order mailed to Quintana & US Atty via Certified Mail. |
Filing 4 Writ of Habeas Corpus Filing fee received - $ 5.00, receipt number 5028905 (MDC) |
Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(MDC) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Kori Michael Young, Pro Se. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Motion requesting Relief, #2 Exhibit B - Letter from Probation Office, #3 Exhibit C - Opinion, #4 MIscellaneous, #5 Motion for an order clarifying sentence, #6 Envelope Postmarked 11/20/2019)(MDC) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, (MDC) |
Conflict Check run. (MDC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Young v. Quintana | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Kori Michael Young | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Quintana | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.