Crabtree v. Walmart Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Travis Crabtree
Defendant: John Doe(s), Walmart Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
Case Number: 5:2019cv00473
Filed: December 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Danny C Reeves
Referring Judge: Matthew A Stinnett
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2020 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Danny C. Reeves for review: #14 Status Report (KM)
January 29, 2020 Filing 14 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership, Walmart Inc., Travis Crabtree. (Stivers, Catherine) Modified to add filers on 1/30/2020 (KM).
January 24, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE to Take Deposition of Travis Crabtree on 2/6/20 1:30 PM by Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership, Walmart Inc..(Stivers, Catherine)
January 17, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE by Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership, Walmart Inc. of Service of Wal-Mart's Initial Disclosures (Stivers, Catherine)
January 17, 2020 Filing 11 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Travis Crabtree.(Davis, James)
January 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: 1. Within 10 days, parties to exchange Rule 26(a)(1) as required; 2. NLT 4/10/2020, plaintiff disclose expert witnesses; NLT 5/8/2020, defendants disclose same; 3. Supplementation under Rule 26(e) due within 30 days of the discovery of new information, but NLT 30 days prior to close of discovery; 4. Discovery due by 7/10/2020; 5. Plaintiffs may take a maximum of 15 depositions, Defendants may take a combined maximum of 15 depositions; 6. Discovery disputes referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge selected by random draw (Stinnett); 7. Motions for extension shall be referred to the undersigned for disposition; 8. Parties may not by agreement extend any deadlines set forth in this scheduling order or for responding to motions; 9. NLT 2/28/2020, plaintiff file motions to amend pleadings or join additional parties; NLT 3/31/2020, defendants file same; 10. Dispositive Motions due by 8/10/2020; 11. The Court declines to schedule a PTC at this time; 12. By 12/23/2020 counsel shall file, submit to Chambers & provide to opposing counsel: witness lists, exhibit lists, pretrial memorandum; 13. By 12/30/2020, counsel shall pre-mark & number all exhibits & provide to opposing counsel; 14 By 12/30/2019, counsel shall file with Clerk & submit to Chambers Agreed Proposed Jury Instructions, 15. Objections due by 12/30/2020; 16. Pretrial Filings may be submitted via email to Chambers; 17. NLT 1/8/2021 parties submit to chambers a copy of each exhibit; 18. JURY TRIAL set for 1/19/2021 at 09:00 AM in LEXINGTON before Judge Danny C. Reeves, counsel present at 8:30 a.m. (3 days); 19. Parties are directed to file a joint status report the first Monday of each month; 20. Parties are directed to use the services of a private mediator in the even they seek to mediate; 21. The Court declines to schedule any PTC at this time. The parties may move the Court to schedule such conferences as necessary. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 1/9/2020.(KM)cc: COR,D,JC
January 8, 2020 Filing 8 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Stivers, Catherine)
December 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: 1) W/in 30 days, parties shall conduct meeting to discuss the possibilities for a settlement or resolution of the case. 2) At the time of the meeting, counsel shall exchange disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). 3) NLT 10 days after the meeting, counsel shall file a joint report outlining the proposed discovery plan. Parties should contemplate a trial date w/in 12 months or less. The report shall include: (a) parties' views and proposals; (b) length of time necessary to join other parties and to amend the pleadings; (c) length of time necessary to file motions; (d) length of time necessary to complete all pretrial discovery, including expert witness discovery; (e) length of time necessary to make expert disclosures; (f) Probable length of trial; (g) dates mutually convenient for trial; (h) whether the parties desire a scheduling conference before entry of a scheduling order; and (i) decision as to whether the action may be referred to a US Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 12/06/2019. (MDC) cc: COR (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/11/2019: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (MDC).
December 5, 2019 Filing 5 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT, Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership, identifying WSE Management, LLC, as the general partner and WSE Investment, LLC, as the limited partner. The sole member of WSE Management, LLC and WSE Investment, LLC is Wal-Mart Stores East, LLC whose Corporate Parent is Walmart Inc. (MDC)
December 5, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE and CERTIFICATE by John Doe(s), Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership, Walmart Inc. (MDC)
December 5, 2019 Filing 3 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Support of Removal, filed by John Doe(s), Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership, Walmart Inc. (MDC)
December 5, 2019 Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Counsel in Support of Removal by Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership, Walmart Inc. (MDC)
December 5, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Clark County Circuit Court, case number 19-CI-541. ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4537551), filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership, Walmart Inc., John Doe(s). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Complaint, #2 Exhibit 3 - Request for Admission to Pla, #3 Exhibit 4- Pla's Response to RFA, #4 Exhibit 5 - State Court Record, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Supplement Notice of Removal to Clark Circuit Court)(MDC)
December 5, 2019 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by John Doe(s), Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership, Walmart Inc. FILED IN STATE COURT RECORD. SEE #1 . (MDC)
December 5, 2019 Conflict Check run. (MDC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crabtree v. Walmart Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe(s)
Represented By: Catherine Amanda Stivers
Represented By: Christopher Rennie Cashen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart Inc.
Represented By: Catherine Amanda Stivers
Represented By: Christopher Rennie Cashen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
Represented By: Catherine Amanda Stivers
Represented By: Christopher Rennie Cashen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Travis Crabtree
Represented By: James E. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?