Pendleton v. SSA
Jeffrey Alan Pendleton |
Commissioner of SSA |
5:2019cv00474 |
December 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Robert E Wier |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER: The Court GRANTS the #8 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice and permits Hon. Melissa A. Palmer, of Olinsky Law Group, to serve as pro hac vice counsel for Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 12/06/2019. (MDC) cc: COR |
Filing 8 MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE by Jeffrey Alan Pendleton (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order)(Palmer, Melissa) Modified text on 12/6/2019 (KJR). |
Filing 7 ORDER: DENYING #5 Motion for Melissa A. Palmer to Appear Pro Hac Vice without prejudice. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 12/06/2019. (MDC) cc: COR |
Filing 6 ORDER: Granting #3 Application (Motion) for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 12/06/2019. (MDC) cc: COR |
Filing 5 MOTION for Melissa A. Palmer to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jeffrey Alan Pendleton ( Filing fee $125; receipt number 0643-4538553) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)(Palmer, Melissa) |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Wier for review: re #8 MOTION Order granting Pro Hac Vice Admission by Jeffrey Alan Pendleton (KJR) |
BAR STATUS Check completed as to Melissa Palmer re #5 MOTION for Melissa A. Palmer to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jeffrey Alan Pendleton ( Filing fee $125; receipt number 0643-4538553). (MDC) |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Robert E. Wier for review: re #5 MOTION for Melissa A. Palmer to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jeffrey Alan Pendleton ( Filing fee $125; receipt number 0643-4538553) (MDC) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court without prepaying Fees or Costs by Jeffrey Alan Pendleton (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(MDC) |
Filing 2 Letter to Clerk from Melissa A. Palmer, Attorney for Plaintiff (MDC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Jeffrey Alan Pendleton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons US Atty's Office, #3 Summons Commissioner of SSA, #4 Summons US Atty General, #5 USM 285 Form - US Atty EDKy, #6 USM 285 Forms - Office of Regional Chief Counsel, #7 USM 285 Form - US Atty General)(MDC) |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Robert E. Wier for review: re #3 APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court w/out prepaying Fees or Costs by Jeffrey Alan Pendleton. (MDC) |
Conflict Check run. (MDC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pendleton v. SSA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Alan Pendleton | |
Represented By: | Melissa Palmer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.