Spivey v. CMRE Financial Services, Inc. et al
| Michael Spivey |
| CMRE Financial Services, Inc. and Credit Bureau Systems, Inc. |
| 5:2019cv00480 |
| December 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Karen K Caldwell |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
AGREED ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING re #14 Proposed Agreed Order: IT IS ORDERED that Defendant, Credit Bureau Systems, Inc., shall have through 2/7/2020 to file a responsive pleading to the Plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 1/31/2020.(KM)cc: COR
|
| Filing 14 Proposed Agreed Order for Additional time for Defendant to file Responsive Pleading by Credit Bureau Systems, Inc.. (Katz, Brian) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by CMRE Financial Services, Inc..(Lewis, Danielle) |
|
Filing 12
AGREED ORDER, Defendant, Credit Bureau Systems, Inc., shall have through and including January 30, 2020, to file a responsive pleading to the Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 1/16/2020.(STC)cc: COR
|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Karen K. Caldwell for review: re #11 Proposed Agreed Order Allowing Credit Bureau through 1/30/2020 to file responsive pleading by Credit Bureau Systems, Inc. (GLD) |
| Filing 11 Proposed Agreed Order Allowing Credit Bureau through 1/30/2020 to file responsive pleading by Michael Spivey, Credit Bureau Systems, Inc.. (Katz, Brian) Modified to add all filers on 1/16/2020 (GLD). |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: The #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by CMRE Financial Services, Inc. is GRANTED. Dft's time to answer or respond to complaint is extended up to and including 1/27/2020. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 1/7/2020.(GLD)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 9
AGREED ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Dft Credit Bureau Systems, Inc. shall have through 1/16/2020 to file responsive pleading to Complaint. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 1/7/20.(GLD)cc: COR
|
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Karen K. Caldwell for review: re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by CMRE Financial Services, Inc. (GLD) |
| Filing 8 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by CMRE Financial Services, Inc.. (Lewis, Danielle) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by CMRE Financial Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Lewis, Danielle) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Karen K. Caldwell for review: re #6 Proposed Agreed Order re Extension of Time to File Answer by Credit Bureau Systems, Inc. (GLD) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Agreed Order re Extension of Time to File Answer by Credit Bureau Systems, Inc.. (Katz, Brian) |
| Filing 5 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Credit Bureau Systems, Inc.. (Katz, Brian) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian S. Katz on behalf of Credit Bureau Systems, Inc. (Katz, Brian) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CMRE Financial Services, Inc., Credit Bureau Systems, Inc.; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically (Attachments: #1 Summons Credit Bureau Systems, Inc.)(MDC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4542703), filed by Michael Spivey. (Attachments: #1 Summons CMRE Financial Services, Inc., #2 Summons Credit Bureau Systems, Inc., #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(MDC) |
| Conflict Check run. (MDC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
