Richardson v. SSA
| Tammie Richardson |
| Commissioner of SSA |
| 5:2020cv00038 |
| February 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Robert E Wier |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tammie Richardson via USM to Commissioner of SSA served on 2/10/2020. Service to U.S. Attorney executed via USPS on 2/10/2020; Service to U.S. Attorney General executed via USPS on 2/12/2020. (GLD) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Commissioner of SSA. (Morgan, Cheryl) |
Filing 8
ORDER: Court GRANTS #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and permits Hon. David F. Chermol to serve as phv counsel for Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 2/4/2020. (GLD)cc: COR
|
| BAR STATUS Check completed as to David Chermol re #5 FIRST MOTION for David F. Chermol to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Tammie Richardson ( Filing fee $125; receipt number 0643-4584461). (GLD) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Robert E. Wier for review: re #5 FIRST MOTION for David F. Chermol to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Tammie Richardson ( Filing fee $125; receipt number 0643-4584461) (GLD) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of SSA, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Summons issued and delivered to U.S. Marshal for service (JLM) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: granting #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 2/3/20. (JLM)cc: COR
|
| Filing 5 FIRST MOTION for David F. Chermol to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Tammie Richardson ( Filing fee $125; receipt number 0643-4584461) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Certificates of Good Standing)(Chermol, David) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY David Chermol by Clerk re: L.R. 83- Attorney Admission procedure w/ a copy of L.R. 83 and Attorney Admission Application (Attachments: #1 Admission Check, #2 Local Rule 83.1 & 83.2 Packet)(KM) |
| Conflict Check run. (KM) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Robert E. Wier for review: re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tammie Richardson (KM) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tammie Richardson (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(KM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Tammie Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Summons SSA, #2 Summons U.S. Attorney General, #3 Summons U.S. Attorney)(KM) Modified text on 2/3/2020 (KM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Richardson v. SSA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tammie Richardson | |
| Represented By: | David Chermol |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of SSA | |
| Represented By: | Cheryl D. Morgan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
