Smith v. Weiser Security Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: James Smith
Defendant: Weiser Security Services, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2020cv00110
Filed: March 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Danny C Reeves
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER: 1. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Smith's claims against Defendant are DISMISSED, without prejudice. 2. Matter is DISMISSED AND STRICKEN FROM DOCKET. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 1/13/2021.(GLD)cc: COR
January 12, 2021 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Danny C. Reeves for review: #15 Order - NO AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL TENDERED. (GLD)
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER: granting #16 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Elizabeth C. Barrera. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 12/22/20. (JLM)cc: COR
December 21, 2020 Filing 16 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Weiser Security Services, Inc. Elizabeth C. Barrera (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Barrera, Elizabeth)
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: Parties have indicated they have reached settlement #14 . IT IS ORDERED: 1. All deadlines set are VACATED. 2. Parties directed to tender Agreed Order of Dismissal w/in 30 days. Failure to comply shall result in action being dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 12/9/2020.(GLD)cc: COR
December 9, 2020 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Danny C. Reeves for review: #14 Status Report (GLD)
December 8, 2020 Filing 14 JOINT STATUS REPORT REGARDING ARBITRATION by James Smith, Weiser Security Services, Inc.. (Barrera, Elizabeth) Modified on 12/9/2020 (GLD).
November 10, 2020 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Danny C. Reeves for review: #13 Status Report (GLD)
November 9, 2020 Filing 13 JOINT STATUS REPORT REGARDING ARBITRATION by James Smith, Weiser Security Services, Inc.. (Barrera, Elizabeth) Modified on 11/10/2020 (GLD).
October 13, 2020 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Danny C. Reeves for review: #12 Status Report (GLD)
October 9, 2020 Filing 12 JOINT STATUS REPORT Regarding Arbitration by James Smith, Weiser Security Services, Inc.. (Barrera, Elizabeth) Modified on 10/13/2020 (GLD).
September 9, 2020 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Danny C. Reeves for review: #11 Status Report (GLD)
September 8, 2020 Filing 11 JOINT STATUS REPORT Regarding Arbitration by James Smith, Weiser Security Services, Inc.. (Barrera, Elizabeth) Modified on 9/9/2020 (GLD).
August 11, 2020 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Danny C. Reeves for review: #10 Status Report (GLD)
August 10, 2020 Filing 10 JOINT STATUS REPORT REGARDING ARBITRATION by James Smith, Weiser Security Services, Inc.. (Barrera, Elizabeth) Modified on 8/11/2020 (GLD).
July 9, 2020 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Danny C. Reeves for review: #9 Status Report (GLD)
July 8, 2020 Filing 9 JOINT STATUS REPORT Regarding Arbitration by James Smmith, Weiser Security Services, Inc.. (Barrera, Elizabeth) Modified on 7/9/2020 (GLD).
June 9, 2020 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Reeves for review: #8 Joint Status Report (STC)
June 8, 2020 Filing 8 JOINT STATUS REPORT Regarding Arbitration by Weiser Security Services, Inc., James Smith. (Barrera, Elizabeth) Modified filers on 6/9/2020 (STC).
May 8, 2020 Filing 7 JOINT STATUS REPORT Regarding Arbitration by James Smith, Weiser Security Services, Inc.. (Barrera, Elizabeth) Modified on 5/11/2020 (GLD).
April 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: (1) GRANTING parties' #4 JOINT MOTION to Stay; the case is STAYED pending the outcome of arbitration; (2) parties are to file joint status report every 30 days detailing the progress of the arbitration efforts; after arbitration is complete, parties shall file a joint status report detailing the outcome of arbitration; failure to comply shall result in dismissal or set for a status conf. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 4/10/20.(KJR)cc: COR
April 10, 2020 Filing 5 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Weiser Security Services, Inc.. (Barrera, Elizabeth)
April 10, 2020 Filing 4 JOINT MOTION to Stay by Weiser Security Services, Inc. and Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Barrera, Elizabeth)
March 23, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Weiser Security Services, Inc. ; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically (SLG)
March 23, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4627158), filed by James Smith.(Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Weiser Security Services, Inc.)(SLG)
March 23, 2020 Conflict Check run. (SLG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Weiser Security Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Weiser Security Services, Inc.
Represented By: Elizabeth C. Barrera
Represented By: J. Andrew Inman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Smith
Represented By: Tamara Patterson
Represented By: Matthew T. Lockaby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?