Robinson v. Tempur Sealy International, Inc. et al
Ali Robinson |
Sealy, Inc., Drew Millar, Tempur Sealy International, Inc. and Sealy Shared Services |
5:2020cv00120 |
March 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Joseph M Hood |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Sealy, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Tempur Sealy International, Inc. for Sealy, Inc... (Mayo, LaToi) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, LaToi D. Mayo. #1 Notice of Removal, has been filed by Sealy, Inc. without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (JJ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Fayette Co. Circuit Court, case number 20-CI-00713. ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4630843), filed by Sealy, Inc., Drew Millar. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Amended State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Notice of Filing, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(JJ) |
Conflict Check run. (JJ) |
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Drew Millar, Sealy, Inc., filed by Ali Robinson. Filed in record at DE #1 -2.(JJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.