Andrew v. Schmidt
Plaintiff: Starling Yvonne Andrew
Defendant: Officer Eric Schmidt
Case Number: 5:2020cv00125
Filed: March 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
Presiding Judge: P SO
Referring Judge: Henry R Wilhoit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Andrew's #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. 2. Andrew's pleading, docketed as a #1 Complaint for administrative purposes, is DISMISSED. 3. This action is STRICKEN from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 4/1/2020.(JJ)cc: COR and Starling Yvonne Andrew by US Mail
March 27, 2020 Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 sample caption)(KJR)
March 27, 2020 Filing 4 STANDING ORDER re: Disclosure of Contact Information: 1. pro se litigants must provide current telephone number, residential address, & if different, mailing address. 2. pro se litigants must provide written notice of change of residential address, & if different, mailing address. 3. Clerk file copy of Order in all non-prisoner pro se actions. Failure to provide required information or change of address may result in appropriate sanctions. (KJR)cc: CORand Starling Yvonne Andrew by US Mail
March 27, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Starling Yvonne Andrew (pro se). Motions referred to P SO. (KJR)
March 27, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED)., filed by Starling Yvonne Andrew (pro se). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit photos of car jack, declaration for deisgn, #2 env postmark illegible)(KJR)
March 27, 2020 Conflict Check run. (KJR)
March 27, 2020 ***MOTION SUBMITTED to PSO for review: re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Starling Yvonne Andrew (KJR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Andrew v. Schmidt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Starling Yvonne Andrew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Eric Schmidt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?