Smith v. Courtney et al
Plaintiff: Da'Quantae Delane Smith
Defendant: Billy Welch, Fayette County Detention Center, Shane Courtney and Andrew King
Case Number: 5:2020cv00231
Filed: June 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Danny C Reeves
Referring Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2020 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #5 Complaint for violation of Constitutional Rights by Da'Quantae Delane Smith (pro se) (SLH)
June 22, 2020 Filing 5 Amended Complaint for Violation of Constitutional Law and Rights of Privacy/Personal Autonomy and Falsifying a Record under Statute 18 USC 1506, 2701, 2073, and 1001, Defamatory Communication Libel Tort by Da'Quantae Delane Smith (pro se) Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 env postmarked 6/17/2020)(SLH) Modified text on 6/23/2020 (KJR).
June 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: It is ORDERED that Smith's complaint #1 is DISMISSED, without prejudice, and this matter is STRICKEN from the docket. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 6/22/2020.(KM)cc: COR and Da'Quantae Delane Smith by US Mail
June 3, 2020 Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 sample caption)(SLH)
June 2, 2020 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: #1 Complaint (Referred) (SLH)
June 1, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT referred to PSO, filed by Da'Quantae Delane Smith (pro se) (Attachments: #1 env postmarked 5/28/2020)(SLH)
June 1, 2020 Conflict Check run. (SLH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Courtney et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Billy Welch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fayette County Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shane Courtney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Da'Quantae Delane Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?