Lundy v. Quintana et al
| Davon Lundy |
| Ms. Cosmore, William Barr, Warden Francisco Quintana, Mr. Cobert, Director of Department of Justice, Ms. Melendez-Rosa and Director of the Bureau of Prisons |
| 5:2020cv00241 |
| June 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| William O Bertelsman |
| P SO |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: 1. Lundy's #1 Motion for Complaint of Relief, construed as a civil complaint, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 2. This action is STRICKEN from that docket. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 6/5/2020.(SLH)cc: COR and Lundy by US Mail
|
| Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 sample caption)(SLH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT referred to PSO, filed by Davon Lundy (pro se) (Attachments: #1 env postmarked 6/2/2020)(SLH) |
| Conflict Check run. (SLH) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: #1 Complaint (Referred) (SLH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
