Wright v. Fayette County Detention Center et al
| Eric Christopher Wright |
| Captain Shawn Campbell, Sergeant Jeremy Abney, Major Dwight Hall and Fayette County Detention Center |
| 5:2020cv00276 |
| June 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Karen K Caldwell |
| P SO |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Eric Chirstopher Wright re #9 Memorandum Opinion & Order, #10 Judgment. (JJ) |
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT: 1. Plaintiff Wright's Complaint [R. #1 ] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 7/28/2020.(JJ)cc: Eric Christopher Wright by US Mail |
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Wright's Complaint [R. #1 ] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2. Wright's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [R. #3 ] is DENIED AS MOOT. 3. The Court will enter an appropriate judgment. 4. This matter is STRICKEN from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 7/28/2020.(JJ)cc: Eric Christopher Wright by US Mail
|
| Filing 8 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(JJ) |
| Filing 6 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Kentucky Western. Case number 1:20-cv-00107. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received electronically. cc: Wright w/ copy of docket sheet |
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 6/26/2020. IT IS ORDERED that the instant action shall be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Central Division, at Lexington pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a) for all further proceedings. All further filings shall be filed with that court. Should further filings be filed in this Court, the Clerk of Court shall transfer the filings to the Eastern District of Kentucky. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; USDC, KYED (CDF) [Transferred from kywd on 6/26/2020.]
|
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (CBD) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Eric Christopher Wright, pro se (JWM) [Transferred from kywd on 6/26/2020.] |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Eric Christopher Wright, pro se (JWM) [Transferred from kywd on 6/26/2020.] |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (JWM) [Transferred from kywd on 6/26/2020.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fayette County Detention Center, Jeremy Abney, Shawn Campbell, Dwight Hall, filed by Eric Christopher Wright, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Evidence Packet, #3 Envelope) (JWM) [Transferred from kywd on 6/26/2020.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
