Smith v. United States of America et al
Joseph Gerald Smith |
United States of America, Warden Quintana and USA |
5:2020cv00314 |
July 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Lexington Office |
Danny C Reeves |
P SO |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(STC) |
Filing 3 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Michigan Eastern. Case number 2:20-cv-11869. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. cc: Petitioner w/ copy of docket sheet |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: #2 Case Transferred, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (STC) |
Conflict Check run. (STC) |
|
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Joseph Gerald Smith against Quintana, United States of America, Receipt No: 130781 - Fee: $ 5. (DAll) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/17/2020: #1 Coversheet) (DAll). [Transferred from mied on 7/21/2020.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.