Montgomery v. Florida Family Court Services Division of Child Support Services, Client Services Unit
| Carlos Antonio Montgomery |
| Florida Family Court Services Division of Child Support Services, Client Services Unit |
| 5:2020cv00350 |
| August 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Joseph M Hood |
| P SO |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 1) The Clerk of Court shall TRANSFER this case to the USDC for the Southern District of Florida; and 2) This Court makes no ruling on any other matter in this case. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 08/20/2020. (MDC) cc: COR and Carlos Antonio Montgomery by US Mail
|
| CLERK'S NOTE re #5 : Case electronically transferred to Southern District of Florida using CM/ECF. (TDA) |
| Clerk's Note: Case has been opened in Southern District of Florida as case 1:20-cv-23470, filed 08/20/2020. (MDC) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER re: Disclosure of Contact Information: 1. pro se litigants must provide current telephone number, residential address, & if different, mailing address. 2. pro se litigants must provide written notice of change of residential address, & if different, mailing address. 3. Clerk file copy of Order in all non-prisoner pro se actions. Failure to provide required information or change of address may result in appropriate sanctions.. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell.(KM)cc: COR and Carlos Montgomery by US Mail
|
| Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(KM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED). (Filing fee $400; receipt number 5030559), filed by Carlos Antonio Montgomery, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Memorandum of Support, #3 Receipt 5030559)(KM) |
| Conflict Check run. (KM) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Complaint (KM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Montgomery v. Florida Family Court Services Division of Child Support Services, Client Services Unit | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Florida Family Court Services Division of Child Support Services, Client Services Unit | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carlos Antonio Montgomery | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
