Pioch v. Quintana
Susan Pioch |
Warden Arturo Quintana |
5:2020cv00403 |
September 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
P SO |
Gregory F VanTatenhove |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 JUDGMENT: 1. Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas courpus is DENIED AS MOOT; 2. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's active docket; 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 11/16/2020.(SLH)cc: COR and Pioch by US Mail |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Pioch's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED AS MOOT; 2. Judgment will be entered contemporaneously; 3. This matter is CLOSED and STRICKEN from the Court's active docket. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 11/16/2020.(SLH)cc: COR, Pioch (US Mail) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of for review: #8 RESPONSE (KM) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE to #1 filed by Arturo Quintana. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Declaration of Carlos Martinez with Attachments, #2 Exhibit A - Email Exchange)(Morgan, Cheryl) Modified text on 10/26/2020 (KM). |
Filing 7 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT to Warden Quintana re #4 Order. (KM) |
Filing 6 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT to U.S. Attorney General re #4 Order. (KM) |
Filing 5 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT to U.S. Attorney's Office re #4 Order. (KM) |
Filing 4 ORDER: 1. Clerk shall send a copy of Pioch's petition [R. 1] and this Order by certified mail to Respondent Francisco Quintana, Warden at FMC-Lexington; the Attorney General for the United States; and the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Kentucky; 2. Respondent shall file a response to Pioch's petition within twenty-one (21) days. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 9/30/2020.(STC)cc: USA,USAG,FQ and Susan Pioch by US Mail |
Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(MDC) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Susan Pioch, Pro Se. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope postmarked 09/25/2020)(MDC) |
Conflict Check run. (MDC) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of P SO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (MDC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pioch v. Quintana | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Susan Pioch | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Arturo Quintana | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.