Jones v. Walmart, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Darrell Jones
Defendant: Walmart, Inc. doing business as Wal-Mart Supercenter, Store #571, Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership doing business as Wal-Mart Supercenter, Store #571, Walmart #00709 doing business as Wal-Mart Supercenter, Store #571 and Walmart #739 doing business as Wal-Mart Supercenter, Store #571
Case Number: 5:2020cv00429
Filed: October 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Claria Horn Boom
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1446
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2020 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership, Walmart #00709, Walmart #739, Walmart, Inc. filed in state court. See DE #1 , page ID #28 for pdf document. (JJ)
October 19, 2020 Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership, Walmart #00709, Walmart #739, Walmart, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent WSE Management, LLC, Corporate Parent WSE Investment, LLC for Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership.. (JJ)
October 19, 2020 Conflict Check run. (JJ)
October 19, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Scott Circuit Court, case number 20-CI-00608. ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4803442), filed by Walmart #739, Walmart, Inc., Walmart #00709, Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(JJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Walmart, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart, Inc. doing business as Wal-Mart Supercenter, Store #571
Represented By: Jennifer Kincaid Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership doing business as Wal-Mart Supercenter, Store #571
Represented By: Jennifer Kincaid Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart #00709 doing business as Wal-Mart Supercenter, Store #571
Represented By: Jennifer Kincaid Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart #739 doing business as Wal-Mart Supercenter, Store #571
Represented By: Jennifer Kincaid Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darrell Jones
Represented By: Kelly Marie Rowan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?