Hawley v. Madison County Detention et al
| Mark Shane Hawley |
| Zack Willis, Steve Tussey, Madison County Detention Center and Eddie Royce Martin |
| 5:2020cv00437 |
| October 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Joseph M Hood |
| P SO |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT: (1) Mark Shane Hawley's claims against the defendants in their official capacities, as well as any claims against the Madison County Detention Center itself, are DISMISSED without prejudice; (2) This civil action is STRICKEN from the Court's docket; and (3) This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment, and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 10/28/2020.(STC)cc: COR and Mark Shane Hawley by US Mail |
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Hawley's claims against the defendants in their official capacities, as well as any claims against the Madison County Detention Center itself, are DISMISSED without prejudice; (2) All pending motions are DENIED as moot; (3) This civil action is STRICKEN from the Court's docket; and (4) The Court will enter a corresponding Judgment. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 10/28/2020.(STC)cc: COR and Mark Shane Hawley by US Mail
|
| Filing 8 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(MDC) |
| Filing 6 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Kentucky Western. Case number 3:20-cv-00696. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. cc: Mark Shane Hawley via US Mail w/docket sheet. |
| Conflict Check run. (TJZ) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (TJZ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 10/21/2020. The instant action shall be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Central Division, at Lexington, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a) for all further proceedings. All further filings shall be filed with that court. Should further filings be filed in this Court, the Clerk of Court shall transfer the filings to the Eastern District of Kentucky. cc: Plaintiff-pro se, EDKY-Lexington (SMJ) [Transferred from kywd on 10/22/2020.]
|
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (SMJ) [Transferred from kywd on 10/22/2020.] |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Mark Shane Hawley. (SMJ) [Transferred from kywd on 10/22/2020.] |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Mark Shane Hawley. (SMJ) [Transferred from kywd on 10/22/2020.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Mark Shane Hawley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (SMJ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/16/2020: #2 Summons) (SMJ). [Transferred from kywd on 10/22/2020.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
