Morguson v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation et al
| Romac, Inc. and Raytheon Technologies Corporation |
| Daniel Wade Morguson |
| 5:2020cv00451 |
| November 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Robert E Wier |
| P.I. : Asbestos |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Robert E. Wier for review: #1 Notice of Removal, #5 Answer to Complaint, Answer to Complaint (SLH) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Raytheon Technologies Corporation.(Welsh, Rosemary) |
| Filing 4 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Romac, Inc.. (Maines, Susan) |
| Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Raytheon Technologies Corporation. (SLH) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Fayette Circuit Court, case number 20-CI-2905. ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4820071), filed by Raytheon Technologies Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- State Court Record, #2 Exhibit B-KY General Assembly- Chap. 92, #3 Exhibit C- Inventory Report on Jurisdictional Status of Federal Areas within the States, #4 Exhibit D- Letters to Governor Willis, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(SLH) |
| ANSWER to Complaint by Romac, Inc. FILED IN STATE COURT RECORD- SEE #1 (SLH) |
| Conflict Check run. (SLH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
