The Lamar Company, LLC v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government
The Lamar Company, LLC doing business as Lamar Advertising of Lexington, KY |
Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government |
5:2021cv00043 |
February 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Danny C Reeves |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss on in the Alternative MOTION to Stay by Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order granting motion to dismiss, #2 Proposed Order granting motion to stay)(Jackson, Nolan) Modified text on 3/26/2021 (KM). |
Filing 15 VIRTUAL ORDER: granting #14 Proposed Agreed Order of Extension of Time to Answer Complaint by Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government. The deadline for the defendant to respond to the Complaint is extended through March 25, 2021. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 2/26/2021.(KM)cc: COR |
Filing 14 Proposed Agreed Order of Extension of Time to Answer Complaint by Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government. (Jackson, Nolan) |
Filing 13 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government. (Jackson, Nolan) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Nolan Miller Jackson on behalf of Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government (Jackson, Nolan) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by The Lamar Company, LLC via certified mail to Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government served on 2/18/2021, answer due 3/11/2021. (Sparks, Robert) |
Filing 10 ORDER:1. Plaintiff's Lamar's #8 Motion for Attorney R. Guy Taft to Appear Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff Lamar's #9 Motion for Attorney Stephen E. Schilling to Appear Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 2/18/2021. (KM)cc: CORand Stephen Schilling with ECF Registration Form by US Mail |
Filing 9 MOTION for Stephen E. Schilling to Appear Pro Hac Vice by The Lamar Company, LLC ( Filing fee $125; receipt number 0643-4899830) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Statement of Attorney Stephen E. Schilling in Support of His Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #3 Proposed Order Granting Motion for Admission of Attorney Stephen E. Schilling Pro Hac Vice)(Sparks, Robert) |
Filing 8 MOTION for R. Guy Taft to Appear Pro Hac Vice by The Lamar Company, LLC ( Filing fee $125; receipt number 0643-4899820) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Statement of Attorney R. Guy Taft in Support of His Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #3 Proposed Order Granting Motion for Admission of R. Guy Taft Pro Hac Vice)(Sparks, Robert) |
BAR STATUS Check completed as to R. Guy Taft, Stephen E. Schilling re #9 MOTION for Stephen E. Schilling to Appear Pro Hac Vice by The Lamar Company, LLC (Filing fee $125; receipt number 0643-4899830), #8 MOTION for R. Guy Taft to Appear Pro Hac Vice by The Lamar Company, LLC (Filing fee $125; receipt number 0643-4899820). (KM) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY Stephen E. Schilling by Clerk re: L.R. 83- Attorney Admission procedure w/ a copy of L.R. 83 and Attorney Admission Application (Attachments: #1 Admission Check, #2 Rule 83.1 & 83.2 Packet)(KM) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY R. Guy Taft by Clerk re: L.R. 83- Attorney Admission procedure w/ a copy of L.R. 83 and Attorney Admission Application (Attachments: #1 Admission Check, #2 Rule 83.1 & 83.2 Packet)(KM) |
Filing 5 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by The Lamar Company, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Lamar Media Corp for The Lamar Company, LLC.. (Sparks, Robert) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Robert Sparks. #1 Complaint has been filed by The Lamar Company, LLC without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (KM) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically (KM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0643-4894644), filed by The Lamar Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Sign Regulations, #2 Exhibit B - Permit Denials, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Tendered Summons)(KM) |
Conflict Check run. (KM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: The Lamar Company, LLC v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government | |
Represented By: | Jason M. Halligan |
Represented By: | Keith Moorman |
Represented By: | Nolan Miller Jackson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: The Lamar Company, LLC doing business as Lamar Advertising of Lexington, KY | |
Represented By: | R. Guy Taft |
Represented By: | Stephen E. Schilling |
Represented By: | Robert R. Sparks |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.