Banks Engineering, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
| Banks Engineering, Inc. |
| National Casualty Company and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company |
| 5:2021cv00107 |
| April 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Danny C Reeves |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Pla Banks Engineering, Inc.'s #11 MOTION to Remand is GRANTED. 2) This matter is REMANDED to Jessamine Circuit Court and STRICKEN from this Court's docket. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 06/10/2021. (MDC) cc: COR and Jessamine Circuit Court by US Mail
|
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Danny C. Reeves for review: #17 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (MDC) |
| Filing 17 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Moore, Bradly) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE to Motion re #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Banks Engineering, Inc. filed by National Casualty Company. (Moore, Bradly) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER: The #14 motion for Darius N. Kandawalla to appear PHV is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 5/18/2021. (SLH)cc: COR
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Darius N. Kandawalla to Appear Pro Hac Vice by National Casualty Company ( Filing fee $125; receipt number 0643-4973523) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order Order)(Moore, Bradly) |
| BAR STATUS Check completed re #14 MOTION for Darius N. Kandawalla to Appear Pro Hac Vice by National Casualty Company ( Filing fee $125; receipt number 0643-4973523). (SLH) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET MODIFICATION TO Bradly Edward Moore re #13 Amended Document: Error 1: Exhibits were filed together with the Notice of Filing instead of as separate attachments. Entry by attorney; Clerk added/described the exhibits as separate attachments. In the future, file each exhibit separately from one another and separate from the main document. Error 2: Exhibits were upside; Entry by attorney; Correction: Clerk rotated the pages and entered the document as a separate attachment; At the browse screen within ECF, always open and view each PDF document before proceeding with the filing. No further action required by counsel. cc: COR (MDC) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Danny C. Reeves for review: #13 Amended Document. (MDC) |
| CLERK'S VIRTUAL NOTICE TO National Casualty Company re #7 Request for Fee Refund : Dft has filed a Request for a Refund of a duplicate payment of a filing fee at DE #7 . Dft requests the sum of $405.00 be refunded; however, Receipt No. 06434959351 indicates the fee erroneously paid was actually $402.00. Therefore, the Clerk will interpret the request as a request for refund in the amount of $402.00. The request is approved in the amount of $402.00. s/Robert R. Carr, Clerk of Court cc: COR, Finance (MDC) |
| NOTICE OF FEE REFUND APPROVED re #7 Request for Fee Refund; the fee transaction involving Receipt No. 0643-4959351 having been erroneously paid, the Clerk APPROVES the refund by processing a credit through the electronic credit card system. The credit refund transaction in the amount of $ 402.00 was successfully completed on 05/13/2021 at 02:36p.m. cc: COR (MDC) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED DOCUMENT by National Casualty Company. Amendment to #1 Notice of Removal, Attachments to Underlying Complaint. (Moore, Bradly). Correct: attachment(s) added on 5/13/2021: #1 Exhibit 1- Banks Engineering Inc, Letter, #2 Exhibit 2 - Preliminary Subdivision Plat, #3 Exhibit 3- Graphics, #4 Exhibit 4- Construction Plan, #5 Exhibit 5- Offer to purchase Contract, #6 Exhibit 6 - Deed, #7 Exhibit 7 - Eastgate Subdivision, #8 Exhibit 8 - Nicholasville Planning Commission, #9 Exhibit 9- Final Record Plat, #10 Exhibit 10- Final Record Eastgate Subdivision - Unit 2, #11 Exhibit 11- Final Record Plat Eastgate Subdivision - Unit 1, #12 Exhibit 12- Excel - Eastgate Subdivision - Unit 2, #13 Exhibit 13- Emails, #14 Exhibit 14- Miller, Griffin & Marks PSC Letter) (MDC). Modified to Add Attachments on 5/13/2021 (MDC). |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET MODIFICATION TO David Russell Marshall re #12 Notice of Filing: Error: Proposed Order was filed as Main Document named "Notice of Filing" instead of as separate attachment. Entry by attorney; Clerk added the proposed order as separate attachment to the Motion In the future, file the Notice using the event Notice of Filing, attach the proposed order, and create a link to the related docket entry. No further action required by counsel. cc: COR (MDC) |
| NOTICE RE: DOCUMENT CONVERSION REQUIREMENT TO David Russell Marshall re #12 Notice of Filing, #10 Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCP 7.1, #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Banks Engineering, Inc. ; Error: the pleading was scanned instead of converted into PDF format directly from the native word application. Use a scanner ONLY if you cannot electronically prepare your documents with a word processing software package and convert them to PDF format. No further action required by counsel. cc: COR (MDC) |
| Filing 12 *INCORRECT* PROPOSED ORDER by Banks Engineering, Inc. re #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Banks Engineering, Inc. Proposed Order (Marshall, David) Modified text on 5/7/2021 (MDC). |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Banks Engineering, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Marshall, David) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/7/2021: #2 CORRECT Proposed Order) (MDC). Modified text/Added Attachment on 5/7/2021 (MDC). |
| Filing 10 FIRST FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Banks Engineering, Inc.. (Marshall, David) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Dfts Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and National Casualty Company, having responded to the Court's #5 Show Cause Order and remedied the deficiencies in their notice of removal, it is hereby ORDERED that the #5 Show Cause Order is SET ASIDE Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 05/06/2021. (MDC) cc: COR
|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE TO #5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by National Casualty Company #5 filed by National Casualty Company. (Moore, Bradly) Modified Text/Added Link on 5/5/2021 (MDC). |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Danny C. Reeves for review: #8 Response to Order to Show Cause (MDC) |
| Filing 7 REQUEST FOR FEE REFUND TO CREDIT CARD by National Casualty Company . (Moore, Bradly) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: (1) parties meet within 30 days; (2) exchange disclosures; (3) Rule 26 Meeting Report due within 10 days thereafter. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 4/28/21. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(KJR)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that defendants shall SHOW CAUSE on or before 5/12/2021 why this matter should not be remanded to state court. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 4/28/2021.(GLD)cc: COR
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by National Casualty Company. (Moore, Bradly) |
| Filing 2 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by National Casualty Company. (Moore, Bradly) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Jessamine Circuit Court, case number 21-CI-176. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number 0643-4959382), filed by National Casualty Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record Complaint, #2 Underlying Complaint - Boone Development v. City of Nicholasville Planning Commission, #3 Professional Liability Insurance Declarations Page, #4 State Court Record Notice of Removal)(KJR) |
| Conflict Check run. (KJR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
