Spring House Commercial, LLC v. City of Richmond, Kentucky et al
Spring House Commercial, LLC |
Phillip Williams, Robert E. Minerich and City of Richmond, Kentucky |
5:2021cv00149 |
May 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Karen K Caldwell |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by City of Richmond, Kentucky. (KJR) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Madison Circuit Court, case number 21-CI-206. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number 0643-4981679), filed by City of Richmond, Kentucky, Phillip Williams, Robert E. Minerich. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record Complaint, #2 State Court Record Motion for Writ of Mandamus, #3 State Court Record Motion for Injunctive Relief, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(KJR) |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Karen K. Caldwell for review: re MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Spring House Commercial, LLC, MOTION for Writ of Mandamus by Spring House Commercial, LLC (KJR) |
MOTION for Injunctive Relief by Spring House Commercial, LLC. (Filed in the State Court Record & attached to DE #1 Notice of Removal). (KJR) |
Conflict Check run. (KJR) |
MOTION for Writ of Mandamus by Spring House Commercial, LLC. (Filed in the State Court Record & attached to DE #1 Notice of Removal). (KJR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.