Kenney Orthopedics of Mount Sterling, LLC v. Becerra
Kenney Orthopedics of Mount Sterling, LLC |
Xavier Becerra and Secretary of Health & Human Services |
5:2021cv00170 |
June 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Matthew A Stinnett |
Robert E Wier |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE OF FEE REFUND APPROVED re #7 Order as to Request for Fee Refund; the fee transaction involving Receipt No. 0643-4997314 having been erroneously paid, the Clerk APPROVES the refund by processing a credit through the electronic credit card system. The credit refund transaction in the amount of $ 402.00 was successfully completed on 7/14/2021 at 4:57:54 PM cc: COR (JLM) |
Filing 7 ORDER: This matter is before the Court upon the Request for Fee Refund (DE #6 ) filed by the plaintiff, Kenney Orthopedics of Mount Sterling, LLC. Upon review of this matter, the Court finds the Plaintiff erroneously paid two filing fees due to an error encountered during the filing of the complaint in this matter on June 16, 2021. Being sufficiently advised, the Court ORDERS that the Clerk is DIRECTED to process a refund of the duplicate filing fee in the amount of $402 (Receipt No. 0643-4997314) through the electronic credit card system. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 7/14/21.(JLM)cc: COR,FIN |
Filing 6 REQUEST FOR FEE REFUND TO CREDIT CARD by Kenney Orthopedics of Mount Sterling, LLC . (Porter, Jacinta) |
Conflict Check run. (JER) |
Filing 5 STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND REFERRAL ORDER: 1. At the outset, the Court reminds the parties that, under Rule 1, they share with the Court the duty to construe, administer, and employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action; 2. Pursuant to 28:636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court refers this case to the appropriate United States Magistrate Judge for this Division; 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court retains for decision any motion dispositive of a claim or defense (as well as motions regulating the trial proof, including Daubert and motions in limine); 4. Concurrent with the filing of any Rule 12 motion, the moving party may file, as a separate motion, any request for a discovery stay pending resolution. The Court refers consideration of any such motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge; 5. Discovery Disputes shall be resolved as defined within this order; The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter this Standing Order in the undersigned's civil cases excepting Social Security, pro se, and prisoner post-conviction matters at case opening (or as the Court otherwise directs). Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier.. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 11/13/20019.(JER)cc: COR |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Xavier Becerra, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Summons issued and returned electronically to counsel (Attachments: #1 Summons -USAO, #2 Summons -HHS)(JER) |
Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Kenney Orthopedics of Mount Sterling, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Kenney Ortho Group, Inc. for Kenney Orthopedics of Mount Sterling, LLC.. (JER) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $402; receipt number 0643-4997309), filed by Kenney Orthopedics of Mount Sterling, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Council Decision, #2 Exhibit B-ALJ Decision, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons -USAG, #5 Summons -USAO, #6 Summons -HHS)(JER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.