Barber v. Milbank Insurance Company
| James Barber |
| Milbank Insurance Company |
| 5:2021cv00213 |
| August 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Edward B Atkins |
| Karen K Caldwell |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
PRETRIAL ORDER: 1. NLT 21 days before PTC counsel shall file the following: a. a list of witnesses & exhibits, b. any appropriate motion in limine, c. transcript of all evidentiary depositions to be used at trial along with any motions for ruling by the court upon objection made in evidentiary deposition, d. pretrial memorandum, e. proposed agreed jury instructions, f. proposed voir dire; 2. NTL 14 days before PTC the parties shall file: a. written objections, b. responses to any other party's motion in limine, c. responses to any other party's motion for ruling on objection made in evidentiary depositions; 3. At PTC, counsel for parties shall be prepared as listed herein this order; 4. PTC shall be attended by all attorneys who will be trying the case. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 10/8/2021.(KM)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: 1. The following deadlines shall be observed in this action: (a) Counsel shall exchange required Rule 26(a)(1) information by 10/30/2021; (b) Motions to Amended Pleadings & Join Additional Parties due by 10/30/2021; (C) Supplementation of disclosures & responses as required by Rule 26(e); (d) Reports from expert witness due from plaintiff 1/31/2022 and from defendant 2/28/2022; (e) Discovery due by 4/30/2022; (f) Dispositive Motions due by 5/15/2022; 2. No motions to compel, nor any other motions relating to a discovery dispute shall be filed unless all counsel has first conferred; 3. Parties shall follow the directives listed herein regarding the filing of discovery materials; 4. No extensions of the deadlines in this order, or those contained in the separate pretrial conference order shall be granted unless appropriate motion is filed prior to expiration of the deadlines in question & upon showing of good cause; 5. FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE set for 11/15/2022 at 01:00 PM in LEXINGTON before Judge Karen K. Caldwell; 6. JURY TRIAL set for 12/12/2022 at 09:00 AM in LEXINGTON before Judge Karen K. Caldwell, counsel should be present by 8:30 a.m. (4 days). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge (Atkins) chosen by random draw for the purposes of managing all discovery and pretrial scheduling issues. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 10/8/2021.(KM)cc: COR,D,JC
|
|
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Karen K. Caldwell for review: #8 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (KM)
|
|
Filing 8
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Hull, M.)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: The Court ORDERS that WITHIN 7 DAYS FROM THE ENTRY DATE OF THIS ORDER the parties shall either 1) file the joint status report as set forth in the 8/18/2021 order or 2) file an Agreed Order of Dismissal. Failure to comply with this order may result in sanctions and dismissal ofthis action. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 10/4/2021.(KM)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Consent to Magistrate Judge Referral by James Barber. (JER)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: 1. Rule 26 meeting w/in 21 days; 2. W/in 10 days after meeting the parties shall file a joint status report containing: a. discovery plan; b. time to file pretrial motions; c. whether this matter is suitable for alternative resolution; d. Probable trial length; e. Parties' decision as to whether this matter may be referred to a Magistrate Judge; f. Mutually convenient dates for trial. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 8/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 AO85-Consent to MJ)(SLH)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 4
ANSWER to Complaint by Milbank Insurance Company.(Hull, M.)
|
|
Conflict Check run. (KM)
|
|
Filing 2
FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Milbank Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent State Auto Mutual Insurance Company, Corporate Parent State Auto Financial Corporation for Milbank Insurance Company.. (KM)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Scott Circuit Court, case number 21-CI-518. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0643-5041143), filed by Milbank Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Record, #2 Exhibit B -Affidavit of Corporate Representative, #3 Exhibit C - Proof of Loss, #4 Exhibit D - State Court Notice of Filing of Removal, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(KM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barber v. Milbank Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Barber | |
| Represented By: | Richard M. Rawdon, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Milbank Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | James P. Nolan, II |
| Represented By: | M. Tyler Hull |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
