Green v. Richmond Senior Community, Limited Partnership et al
Plaintiff: Minerva Green
Defendant: Richmond Senior Community, Limited Partnership, HC Realty Advisors, LLC and Independent Healthcare Properties, LLC doing business as Morning Pointe of Richmond
Case Number: 5:2021cv00224
Filed: August 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Edward B Atkins
Referring Judge: Robert E Wier
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE set for 11/8/2021 at 01:00 PM in LEXINGTON before Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins. 1) Counsel are directed to have their respective clients/representatives, fully authorized to negotiate and approve a settlement in this matter, resent and available at all times during the conference. Any failure to comply will result in the conference being cancelled. 2) NLT CLOSE OF BUSINESS on 10/28/2021, counsel shall submit to the undersigned separate, confidential statements which shall specify their respective settlement positions. Each statement is to be furnished only to Magistrate Judge Atkins and not to the other side. 3) In their respective statements, counsel shall provide a candid assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of both sides, an appraisal of the issues such as liability, and the anticipated economic cost of further preparation and litigation of this matter through trial; 4) The Magistrate Judge requests that bona fide settlement negotiations commence as soon as practicable and be conducted as often as necessary prior to settlement conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 10/26/2021. (MDC) cc: COR, D
October 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: 1) Parties exchanges Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures by 10/13/2021; Supplementation due w/in 30 days of discovery of new information or the need to supplement, but shall occur NLT 30 days prior to the discovery deadline. 2) Motion to Join parties or Amend Pleadings due by 3/1/2022. 3) NLT 07/01/2022, Pla to disclose the identity of Expert Witness; The same is required by the Dft NLT 08/15/2022. 4) Pretrial fact and expert discovery due NLT 09/30/2022. 5) Dispositive Motions and Daubert motions due by 10/31/2022. 6) Shall a discovery dispute arise, the parties are directed to comply with the stated protocol in the #4 Standing Case Management and Referral Order. 7) A courtesy copy of briefs and memoranda in support of motions must be provided to Chambers within 48 hours of electronic filing. 8) Requests to modify any dates or deadlines established by this order shall be submitted upon motion filed prior to expiration of the deadline in question, and upon showing of good cause beyond the control of counsel in the exercise of due diligence. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 10/05/2021. (MDC) cc: COR
September 29, 2021 Filing 7 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Litvinov, Aleksandr)
September 29, 2021 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins for review: #7 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (MDC)
September 2, 2021 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by HC Realty Advisors, LLC, Independent Healthcare Properties, LLC, Richmond Senior Community, Limited Partnership.(U'Sellis, Megan)
September 2, 2021 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins for review: #6 Answer to Complaint (MDC)
August 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: 1. By 9/21/2021, parties shall meet to consider topics Rule 26(f)(2) mandates; 2. Within 14 days of meeting, the parties shall file a joint status report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 8/31/2021.(KM)cc: COR
August 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND REFERRAL ORDER: 1. At the outset, the Court reminds the parties that, under Rule 1, they share with the Court the duty to construe, administer, and employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action; 2. Pursuant to 28:636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court refers this case to United States Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins; 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court retains for decision any motion dispositive of a claim or defense (as well as motions regulating the trial proof, including Daubert and motions in limine); 4. Concurrent with the filing of any Rule 12 motion, the moving party may file, as a separate motion, any request for a discovery stay pending resolution. The Court refers consideration of any such motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge; 5. Discovery Disputes shall be resolved as defined within this order; The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter this Standing Order in the undersigned's civil cases excepting Social Security, pro se, and prisoner post-conviction matters at case opening (or as the Court otherwise directs). Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier.. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 11/13/2019.(JER)cc: COR
August 30, 2021 Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by HC Realty Advisors, LLC, Independent Healthcare Properties, LLC, Richmond Senior Community, Limited Partnership identifying Corporate Parent Kentucky Medical Investors, LLC, Corporate Parent HC Realty Advisors, LLC for Richmond Senior Community, Limited Partnership.. (JER)
August 30, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Madison County Circuit Court, case number 21-ci-349. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number 0643-5054504), filed by Richmond Senior Community, Limited Partnership, HC Realty Advisors, LLC, Independent Healthcare Properties, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Action, #2 Exhibit B-Affidavit of Norma Cooper, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(JER)
August 30, 2021 Conflict Check run. (JER)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Green v. Richmond Senior Community, Limited Partnership et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Minerva Green
Represented By: Robert L. Roark
Represented By: Tyler Zachary Korus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richmond Senior Community, Limited Partnership
Represented By: Aleksandr Litvinov
Represented By: Megan R. U'Sellis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HC Realty Advisors, LLC
Represented By: Aleksandr Litvinov
Represented By: Megan R. U'Sellis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Independent Healthcare Properties, LLC doing business as Morning Pointe of Richmond
Represented By: Aleksandr Litvinov
Represented By: Megan R. U'Sellis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?