Davis H. Elliot Construction Company, Inc. v. High Voltage Maintenance Corporation
| Davis H. Elliot Construction Company, Inc. |
| High Voltage Maintenance Corporation |
| 5:2021cv00235 |
| September 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Matthew A Stinnett |
| Robert E Wier |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
VIRTUAL ORDER: granting #10 Proposed Agreed Order by High Voltage Maintenance Corporation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew A. Stinnett on 10/22/2021. (SLH)cc: COR
|
| Filing 10 Proposed Agreed Order by High Voltage Maintenance Corporation. (Amato, Stephen) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by High Voltage Maintenance Corporation. (Amato, Stephen) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF FILING by Davis H. Elliot Construction Company, Inc. of Proof of Service of Summons on 10-01-21 (Cox, Donald) |
| Filing 7 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Davis H. Elliot Construction Company, Inc.. (Cox, Donald) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to High Voltage Maintenance Corporation; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically for service by CT Corporation. (SLH) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING by Davis H. Elliot Construction Company, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Summons)(Cox, Donald) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Donald L. Cox and Lori Wisniewski Azzara. #1 Complaint has been filed by Davis H. Elliot Construction Company, Inc. without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (JER) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND REFERRAL ORDER: 1. At the outset, the Court reminds the parties that, under Rule 1, they share with the Court the duty to construe, administer, and employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action; 2. Pursuant to 28:636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court refers this case to the appropriate United States Magistrate Judge for this Division; 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court retains for decision any motion dispositive of a claim or defense (as well as motions regulating the trial proof, including Daubert and motions in limine); 4. Concurrent with the filing of any Rule 12 motion, the moving party may file, as a separate motion, any request for a discovery stay pending resolution. The Court refers consideration of any such motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge; 5. Discovery Disputes shall be resolved as defined within this order; The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter this Standing Order in the undersigned's civil cases excepting Social Security, pro se, and prisoner post-conviction matters at case opening (or as the Court otherwise directs). Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier.. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 11/13/2019.(JER)cc: COR
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED). ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5078648), filed by Davis H. Elliot Construction Company, Inc..(JER) |
| Conflict Check run. (JER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis H. Elliot Construction Company, Inc. v. High Voltage Maintenance Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Davis H. Elliot Construction Company, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Donald L. Cox |
| Represented By: | Lori W. Azzara |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: High Voltage Maintenance Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Garrett Amato |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
