Adams v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
Amanda A. Adams |
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois |
5:2021cv00237 |
September 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Karen K Caldwell |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois. (Lamb, D.) |
Filing 9 NOTICE to Take Deposition of Amanda A. Adams on November 30, 2021 at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time by Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois.(Cassis, Charles) |
Filing 8 ORDER: 1) Parties may begin discovery on only the UM Coverage issue, deadline 1/31/2022. 2) NLT 2/21/2022 parties SHALL FILE status report w/ the Court stating whether the parties intend to engage in mediation or other form of dispute resolution.. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 11/01/2021.(JER)cc: COR |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Karen K. Caldwell for review: #7 Status Report and Agreed Schedule (MDC) |
Filing 7 JOINT STATUS REPORT AND AGREED SCHEDULE by Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois. (Cassis, Charles) |
Filing 6 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: 1) Parties meet within 21 days; 2) Joint Status Report within 10 days thereafter. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 09/30/2021. (MDC) cc: COR |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Policy)(Cassis, Charles) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Karen K. Caldwell for review: #5 Answer to Complaint (MDC) |
Filing 4 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois. (Cassis, Charles) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Charles H. Cassis. #1 Notice of Removal has been filed by Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (JER) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Jessamine Circuit Court, case number 21-ci-511. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5082839), filed by Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(JER) |
Conflict Check run. (JER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Adams v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Amanda A. Adams | |
Represented By: | Escum L. Moore, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois | |
Represented By: | Charles H. Cassis |
Represented By: | D. Craig Lamb |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.