Hodge v. Doyle et al
Plaintiff: Douglas Matthew Hodge
Defendant: Jailer Frank Doyle, Captain Seth Newsome and Lieutenant Harold Little
Case Number: 5:2021cv00239
Filed: September 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Joseph M Hood
Referring Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: 1. Hodge's complaint #1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to his right to file a new civil rights action regarding the matters raised in his initial pleading; 2. All pending motions are DENIED as moot; 3. The specific action is STRICKEN from the docket; 4. The Clerk's Office is directed to send Hodge the following blank forms: a. A court-approved Civil Rights Complaint Form [EDKY 520 Form]; b. An application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [AO 240 Form]; and c. A Certificate of Inmate Account form [EDKY 523 Form]; 5. If Hodge wishes to file a new civil rights action regarding the matters raised, he may do so by proceeding in accordance with the instructions set forth above. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 10/6/20214.(KM)cc: COR and Douglas Matthew Hodge by US Mail with forms listed
October 5, 2021 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Complaint (JER)
October 5, 2021 Conflict Check run. (JER)
September 29, 2021 Filing 4 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Filing)(JER)
September 29, 2021 Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Douglas Matthew Hodge. (JER)
September 29, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED)., filed by Douglas Matthew Hodge. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Plaintiff, #2 Envelope bearing no postmark)(JER) Modified date on 10/5/2021 (JER).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hodge v. Doyle et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Douglas Matthew Hodge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jailer Frank Doyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Captain Seth Newsome
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lieutenant Harold Little
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?