Jackson v. Konecranes, Inc.
Plaintiff: Allen Jackson
Defendant: Konecranes, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2021cv00240
Filed: September 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Danny C Reeves
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2021 Opinion or Order ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Danny C. Reeves for review: #8 Answer to Amended Complaint (JER)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: 1. w/in 30 days counsel conduct Rule 26(f) meeting to discuss possibilities for prompt resolution of case and develop proposed discovery plan; 2. At time of meeting, exchange Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures; 3. No later than 10 days after meeting, file written joint report outlining proposed discovery plan. Include info as noted; Consent form attached. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 11/5/2021. (Attachments: #1 AO85)(STC)cc: COR
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CORPORATE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Konecranes, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent KCI Holding USA Inc., Corporate Parent Konecranes for Konecranes, Inc... (Wright, Kathleen)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ANSWER to #7 Amended Complaint by Konecranes, Inc..(Wright, Kathleen)
October 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Konecranes, Inc., filed by Allen Jackson.(SLH)
October 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: 1. The #4 Show Cause Order previously entered is SET ASIDE; 2. Pltf's #5 motion is GRANTED to the extent it seeks leave of court to file an Amended Complaint; 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file the proposed Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 10/13/2021. (SLH)cc: COR
October 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Leave by Allen Jackson AND Response to Show Cause Order (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1_[Proposed] Amended Complaint, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave)(Korus, Tyler)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 It is hereby ORDERED Ptf. Jackson is directed to SHOW CAUSE why this matter should not be dismissed for want of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 10/01/2021.(JER)cc: COR
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Konecranes, Inc.; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically (JER)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5088413), filed by Allen Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(JER)
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Conflict Check run. (JER)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Konecranes, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Allen Jackson
Represented By: Robert L. Roark
Represented By: Tyler Zachary Korus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Konecranes, Inc.
Represented By: Kathleen Biggs Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?