Dunn v. Quintana
| Jarrett Dunn |
| Francisco Quintana |
| 5:2021cv00280 |
| November 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Danny C Reeves |
| P SO |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
USCA Case Number 21-6078. Case Manager Julie Connor for #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Jarrett Dunn. (MDC)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: 1. Clerk shall send Dunn 6CCA Form 4 and Cert of Inmate Account (EDKY 523). 2. Dunn must either pay $505 appellate filing fee to Clerk or complete following steps: a. complete the Sixth Circuit Form 4; b. have prison staff complete and sign the Certificate of Inmate Account Form [E.D. Ky. 523 Form]; and c. file both documents with the Court. If fails to take steps w/in 30 days from this Order, appeal may be dismissed. 3. Clerk shall forward to 6CCA Clerk. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 11/16/2021. (Attachments: #1 6CCA Form 4, #2 EDKY 523)(GLD)cc: COR and Dunn by US Mail
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #5 Judgment, by Jarrett Dunn. (SHORT RECORD AND COPY OF APPEAL MAILED). cc: COR, 6CCA (Attachments: #1 Envelope bearing 11/9/2021 postmark)(JER)
|
|
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #7 Notice of Appeal (JER)
|
|
Filing 6
FILING Filing fee received - $ 5, receipt number 5033188 (JER)
|
|
Filing 5
JUDGMENT: 1. Dunn's petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 is DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. 2. FINAL AND APPEALABLE Judgment and no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 11/4/2021.(GLD)cc: COR and Dunn by US Mail
|
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Dunn's petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 #1 is DISMISSED and relief sought DENIED. 2. Action DISMISSED AND STRICKEN from Court's docket. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 11/4/2021.(GLD)cc: COR and Dunn by US Mail
|
|
Filing 3
IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Filing)(JER)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jarrett Dunn. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Letter to Clerk, #3 Envelope bearing 11/2/2021 postmark)(JER)
|
|
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (JER)
|
|
Conflict Check run. (JER)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dunn v. Quintana | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jarrett Dunn | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Francisco Quintana | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
