Boulder v. Chandler
| John George Boulder |
| Warden Larry Chandler |
| 5:2021cv00314 |
| December 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Edward B Atkins |
| Claria Horn Boom |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Larry Chandler. (Barry, Mark) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT to Daniel Cameron and Warden Larry Chandler re #6 Order. (Attachments: #1 Chandler Green Card)(JER) Modified Text on 12/21/2021 (MDC). |
Filing 6
ORDER: 1) A copy of the #1 Petition shall be served by certified mail upon Respondent and Atty General for the Commonwealth of KY; 2) Respondent, by counsel, shall answer the petition w/in 60 days from the date of service. 3) The Answer shall be in accordance w/ Rule 5 Governing section 2254 in the USDC. 4) The parties shall serve upon each other, or if an appearance has been entered by counsel, upon each attorney, a copy of every further pleading or other document submitted for consideration by the court. 5) Petitioner shall keep the Clerk of Court informed of his current mailing address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 12/15/2021. (MDC) cc: COR Warden Larry Chandler and Atty General (Order + Complaint) via certified mail. (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/15/2021: #1 Cert Mail receipt) (MDC).
|
| Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Filing)(JER) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by John George Boulder pro se. (JER) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John George Boulder pro seMotions referred to Edward B. Atkins. (JER) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by John George Boulder, Pro Se. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Envelope bearing no postmark)(JER) Modified text on 12/15/2021 (MDC). |
| Conflict Check run. (JER) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins for review: re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John George Boulder (JER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Boulder v. Chandler | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: John George Boulder | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Larry Chandler | |
| Represented By: | Mark Daniel Barry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
