USA v. $6,340.00 in United States Currency et al
| USA |
| $6,340.00 in United States Currency, $6,700.00 in United States Currency and $77,009.02 Seized From the Bank Accounts of Hank Williams |
| 5:2022cv00003 |
| January 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Gregory F VanTatenhove |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 RETURN of Service as to $77,009.20, filed by USA. (JER) |
| Filing 7 RETURN of Service as to $6,340.00 in US Currency, filed by USA. (JER) |
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service as to $6,700.00 in US Currency, filed by USA. (JER) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Prosecution to 5:20-cr-138-JMH by USA (JER) Modified text on 1/4/2022 (JER). |
| Filing 4 Warrant in Rem Issued as to All Defendants; service via email to USMS. (Attachments: #1 285-1, #2 285-2, #3 285-3)(JER) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/5/2022: #4 Receipt) (JER). |
| Filing 2 Application for Issuance of Warrant in rem by USA (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 285-1, #3 285-2, #4 285-3)(JER) |
| Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Daniel McMahan, #2 Affidavit of Daniel R. McMahan, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(JER) |
| Conflict Check run. (JER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
