Martin et al v. American Strategic Insurance Corp.
Cash Martin and Pamela Martin |
American Strategic Insurance Corp. |
5:2022cv00024 |
February 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Matthew A Stinnett |
Gregory F VanTatenhove |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial disclosures due by 4/11/2022. Expert reports filed as directed herein. Discovery disputes resolved as directed herein. Motions to Amended Pleadings and to Join Additional Parties due by 7/15/2022. Pretrial Filings due by 5/26/2023. Dispostive motions due by 5/26/2023. FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE set for 9/12/2023 at 01:30 PM in FRANKFORT before Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove. Pretrial filings due as directed herein this order. JURY TRIAL set for 9/25/2023 at 10:00 AM in FRANKFORT before Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove. Requests to modify any dates or deadlines by this order shall be submitted upon motion filed prior to expiration of the deadline in question & upon showing of good cause. This matter is referred to (Magistrate Judge Stinnett) for the purposes as listed herein this order. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 3/23/2022.(KM)cc: COR,Frankfort Clerk |
Filing 8 Joint Proposed Scheduling Order and Discovery Plan by American Strategic Insurance Corp.. (Barton, Neil) Modified Filers/Text on 3/22/2022 (MDC). |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove for review: re #8 Joint Proposed Scheduling Order and Discovery Plan by American Strategic Insurance Corp. (MDC) |
Filing 7 FIRST ANSWER to Complaint by American Strategic Insurance Corp..(Barton, Neil) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove for review: #7 Answer to Complaint (MDC) |
Filing 6 REQUEST FOR FEE REFUND TO CREDIT CARD by American Strategic Insurance Corp. . (Barton, Neil) |
NOTICE OF FEE REFUND APPROVED re #6 REQUEST FOR FEE REFUND; the fee transaction involving Receipt No. AKYEDC-5183985 having been erroneously paid, the Clerk APPROVES the refund by processing a credit through the electronic credit card system. The credit refund transaction in the amount of $ 402.00 was successfully completed on 2/07/22 at 12:21:33 PM cc: COR (JLM) |
Clerk's Note re #4 Notice to Attorney, Notice may be disregarded as it was sent due to a typo by counsel in the initiating documents submitted to the Court. (JER) Modified on 2/7/2022 (STC). |
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURES by American Strategic Insurance Corp..(Barton, Neil) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY Matthew E. Breetz by Clerk re: L.R. 83 - Attorney Admission procedures w/ a copy of L.R. 83.1 and 83.2 (Attachments: #1 Rule 83.1, 83.2 and forms)(JER) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Matthew E. Breetz and Neil Barton. #1 Notice of Removal has been filed by American Strategic Insurance Corp. without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (JER) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Montgomery Circuit Court, case number 21-ci-90214. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number BKYEDC-5183985), filed by American Strategic Insurance Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Record)(JER) |
Conflict Check run. (JER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.