Evexia Plus, LLC v. Cockett et al
| Evexia Plus, LLC |
| Dylan Cockett doing business as Cockett Industries, Inc., Cockett Industries, Corp. a Utah Corporation doing business as Cockett Industries, Inc., Elemental Processing, LLC, Cockett Industries, Corp. and Cockett Industries, Inc. |
| 5:2022cv00054 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Karen K Caldwell |
| Matthew A Stinnett |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 REQUEST for Production of Documents by Evexia Plus, LLC.(Bayer, Bennett) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF FILING by Elemental Processing, LLC Corrected First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents on Plaintiff (Pernice, Anthony) |
| Filing 19 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Evexia Plus, LLC.(Bayer, Bennett) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF FILING by Elemental Processing, LLC First INT & RPD to Plaintiff (Jones, B.) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF FILING by Elemental Processing, LLC Answers & Responses to Plaintiff's INT and RPD (Jones, B.) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Cockett Industries, Corp.. (Hardin, Chadler) |
Filing 15
PRETRIAL ORDER re Pretrial Filing. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 04/07/2022. (MDC) cc: COR
|
|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER: 1) Deadlines: a) Parties exchange info by 05/13/2022. Not need to be filed in the record. b) Motions to Join Additional Parties or Amend Pleadings due by 12/1/2022. c) Supplementation as required by Rule 26(e). Not need to be filed in the record. d) Reports from expert trial witnesses: i) Pla: 02/01/2023; ii) Dft: 04/01/2023. e) Discovery: Fact discovery due by 01/01/2023; Expert discovery due by 06/01/2023. f) Dispositive Motions due by 8/15/2023. No extension of time may be granted by the USMJ or by agreement of the parties. 2) No motions to compel, nor any other motions relating to a discovery dispute, shall be filed unless all counsel involved in such dispute have first conferred. 3) Parties shall observe directives re the filings of discovery materials. 4) No extensions of the deadlines set in this order, or those contained in the separate pretrial conference order also entered this date shall be granted unless an appropriate motion is filed prior to expiration of the deadline in question, and upon a showing of good cause beyond the control of counsel in the exercise of due diligence. 5) PRETRIAL CONFERENCE set for 2/7/2024 at 11:00 AM in LEXINGTON before Judge Karen K. Caldwell. 6)JURY TRIAL set for 2/26/2024 at 09:00 AM in LEXINGTON before Judge Karen K. Caldwell. Counsel to be present by 08:30 a.m. (07 days). This matter is referred to the USMJ Matthew A. Stinnett for purposes of managing all discovery and pretrial scheduling issues, including resolving disputes and revising any dates and deadlines established in the Court's Scheduling Order, except for the dispositive motion deadline. Discovery disputes shall be resolve on the manner described in this Order.. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 04/07/2022. (MDC) cc: COR, D, JC
|
| Filing 12 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Bayer, Bennett) Modified filers on 4/7/2022 (MDC). |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Karen K. Caldwell for review: #12 Joint Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (MDC) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: 1) Parties meet within 21 days; 2) Joint status Report 14 days thereafter; In the event this matter involves a corporation or partnership, this party is directed to advise the Court at the time of the submission of the parties joint report of all parent corporations, subsidiaries, affiliates, members and/or partners with which it is associated. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 03/18/2022. (MDC) cc: COR
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Dylan Cockett, Cockett Industries, Corp..(Ballantine, Douglas) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF FILING by Elemental Processing, LLC Answer filed in State Court (Lewis, Danielle) |
| Filing 8 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Cockett Industries, Corp.. (Ballantine, Douglas) |
| Filing 7 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Evexia Plus, LLC. (Bayer, Bennett) |
| Filing 6 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Elemental Processing, LLC. (Pernice, Anthony) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF RECUSAL: Judge Danny C. Reeves RECUSED. Case REASSIGNED to Judge Karen K. Caldwell by random draw for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 03/10/2022. (MDC) cc: COR and Patrick McClure Williams via US Mail
|
| Conflict Check run. (JER) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Douglas C. Ballantine. #1 Notice of Removal, has been filed by Cockett Industries Corp. without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (JER) Modified date on 3/10/2022 (JER). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Fayette Circuit Court, case number 22-ci-285. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5211966), filed by Dylan Cockett, Cockett Industries, Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Complaint, #2 Exhibit B-SoS Filing, #3 Exhibit C-Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit D-Demand Letter, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(JER) Modified text on 3/10/2022 (JER). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
