Williams et al v. USA
| Sandra Williams and Gregory Williams |
| Abbie Harts Gutierrez, Abbie Gutierrez and USA |
| 5:2022cv00187 |
| July 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Danny C Reeves |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: 1. USA's #9 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is GRANTED. 2. The plaintiffs' Complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice. 3. This matter is STRICKEN from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 8/31/2022. (STC)cc: COR
|
| NOTICE OF DOCKET MODIFICATION TO Jeffrey W. Adamson re #10 RESPONSE to Motion: Error 1: attachment was insufficiently described as Exhibit 1. Entry by attorney; Correction: the Clerk renamed the attachments. Attachments must be adequately described. Example: Exhibit 1 (incorrect); Exhibit 1 -Affidavit of John Doe (correct). No further action required by counsel. Error 2: the response to #9 Motion was incorrectly filed using the event Response. Entry by attorney; Clerk modified the docket text of #10 to state, Response to Motion. The correct event is Response to Motion; In the future, contact the ECF help desk when assistance is needed to select the correct event. No further action required by counsel. cc: COR (MDC) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #9 Motion to Dismiss for lack of Jurisdiction by USA, filed by Gregory Williams, Sandra Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Copy of USDC EDMI Opinion , #2 Proposed Order)(Adamson, Jeffrey) Modified text to describe exh/Correct event on 8/30/2022 (MDC). |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by USA (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A - Declaration of Melissa Davis, #3 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss)(Stone, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: 1) USA's Motion to Substitute #2 is GRANTED. 2) Dft. Abbie Harts Gutierrez is DISMISSED as a party and the USA is SUBSTITUTED as dft. herein. Caption shall be amended to reflect the substitution of the USA as sole dft. in this action.. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 08/09/2022.(JER)cc: COR
|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to #2 U.S.A. Motion to Substitute filed by Gregory Williams, Sandra Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Proposed Order)(Adamson, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: 1) The Court's #5 Order is STRICKEN from the docket. 2) US's #2 Motion to substitute is REINSTATED. 3) Pla shall respond to the #2 Motion to Substitute on or before 08/08/2022. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 07/25/2022. (MDC) cc: COR
|
| Filing 5 STRICKEN FROM DOCKET: Court's #6 Order. PURSUANT TO Notice of Action Striking Document filed on 07/25/2022. (MDC) cc: COR |
| Conflict Check run. (SAM) |
| NOTICE OF ACTION BY CLERK STRIKING A DOCUMENT FROM THE RECORD re #5 Order:Stricken from docket per Court's #6 Order. *DCR* cc: COR (MDC) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Danny C. Reeves for review: re #2 MOTION to Substitute Party by Abbie Harts Gutierrez (SAM) |
| Filing 4 Certification (SAM) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Substitute U.S. in place of Abbie Harts Gutierrez by Abbie Harts Gutierrez (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order)(SAM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Fayette Circuit Court, case number 22-CI-01557., filed by Abbie Harts Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record)(SAM) Modified text on 7/25/2022 (SAM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
