Osborne v. State of Ohio et al
Petitioner: Donna-Kay Osborne
Respondent: State of Ohio and U.S. Federal Marshall
Case Number: 5:2022cv00233
Filed: September 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: William O Bertelsman
Referring Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: 1. The Clerk shall TRANSFER this action to the Cincinnati Division of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio; 2. The Clerk shall STRIKE this matter from the docket. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 9/14/2022.(KM)cc: COR and Donna-Kay Osborne by US Mail
September 14, 2022 Clerk's Note re #5 Order to Transfer: case electronically transferred to Southern District of Ohio (Cincinnati) via CM/ECF. (KM)
September 14, 2022 Clerk's Note: Case transferred has been opened in Southern District of Ohio as case 1:22-cv-00529 re #5 Order. (STC)
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER re: Disclosure of Contact Information: 1. pro se litigants must provide current telephone number, residential address, & if different, mailing address. 2. pro se litigants must provide written notice of change of residential address, & if different, mailing address. 3. Clerk file copy of Order in all non-prisoner pro se actions. Failure to provide required information or change of address may result in appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 05/06/2016.(SAM)cc: CORand Donna-Kay Osborne by US Mail
September 13, 2022 Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample caption)(SAM)
September 13, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 500000605.), filed by Donna-Kay Osborne. (Attachments: #1 Southern District of Ohio Record, #2 Receipt, #3 Letter, #4 Return Letter, #5 Envelope post marked 09/09/2022)(SAM)
September 13, 2022 Conflict Check run. (SAM)
September 13, 2022 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (SAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Osborne v. State of Ohio et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Donna-Kay Osborne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Ohio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: U.S. Federal Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?