Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Kaizen Billiards LLC et al
| Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. |
| Kaizen Billiards LLC doing business as Kaizen Billiards and Christopher E. Curtis |
| 5:2022cv00298 |
| November 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Gregory F VanTatenhove |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Christopher E. Curtis, Kaizen Billiards LLC; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued- Christopher E. Curtis)(SAM) |
| Filing 4 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.. (Foisy, Kenneth) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, Kenneth Andrew Foisy. #1 Complaint has been filed by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (SAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5410984), filed by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Tendered- Kaizen Billiards LLC, #3 Summons Tendered- Christopher Curtis)(SAM) |
| Conflict Check run. (SAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
