Emrit v. University of Miami School of Law et al
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant: University of Miami School of Law, President of the University of Miami and Dean of the University of Miami School of Law
Case Number: 5:2023cv00087
Filed: March 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: P SO
Referring Judge: Gregory F VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2023 Filing 10 USCA Case Number 23-5314 Case Manager Gretchen S. Abruzzo for #8 Notice of Appeal filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. Dft has until 05/12/2023 to weither pay appellate filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and an accompanying financial affidavit. (DC)
April 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: 1. The Clerk's office is directed to Send plaintiff a Sixth Circuit Form 4; 2.Within 30 days from the entry of this Order, the Plaintiff must either pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee to the Clerk of this Court or move for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by completing the Sixth Circuit Form 4 and filing it with this Court; 3. The Clerk's office is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 4/11/2023.(KM)cc: COR, 6 CCA and Ronald Emrit by US Mail. Modified text on 4/12/2023 (DC).
April 11, 2023 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove for review: #8 Notice of Appeal. (DC)
April 10, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #7 Judgment, by Ronald Satish Emrit, pro se. (SHORT RECORD MAILED VIA US MAIL TO RONALD SATISH EMRIT). cc: COR, 6CCA (Attachments: #1 Envelope dated 4-4-23)(KCF)
March 21, 2023 Filing 7 JUDGMENT: 1. The plaintiff's present pleading #1 is DISMISSED without prejudice as improvidently filed; 2. This action is STRICKEN from the docket; 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 3/21/2023.(KM)cc: COR and Ronald Emrit by US Mail
March 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: 1. The Plaintiff's present pleading #1 is DISMISSED without prejudice as improvidently filed; 2. All pending motions are DENIED as moot; 3. This action is STRICKEN from the docket; 4. The Court will enter a corresponding Judgment. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 3/21/2023.(KM)cc: COR and Ronald Emrit by US Mail
March 17, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronald Satish Emrit, pro se.Motions referred to P SO. (KCF)
March 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER re: Disclosure of Contact Information: 1. pro se litigants must provide current telephone number, residential address, & if different, mailing address. 2. pro se litigants must provide written notice of change of residential address, & if different, mailing address. 3. Clerk file copy of Order in all non-prisoner pro se actions. Failure to provide required information or change of address may result in appropriate sanctions.. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 05/06/2016.(KCF)cc: CORand Ronald Satish Emrit by US Mail
March 17, 2023 Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Attachment Sample Caption)(KCF)
March 17, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED)., filed by Ronald Satish Emrit, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment Envelope (unknown date)(KCF)
March 17, 2023 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Complaint ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronald Satish Emrit, pro se. (KCF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Emrit v. University of Miami School of Law et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: University of Miami School of Law
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: President of the University of Miami
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dean of the University of Miami School of Law
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?