Mannino v. USA et al
| Guy Christopher Mannino |
| Does Warden, Administrative Staff in Accounts Payable - F.M.C Lexington; CEO, CFO, Employees in Accounts Receivable - Southeastern Physician Service; CEO/Managing Partner, Collection Agents - Wakefield and Associates, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Southeastern Physician Service and Wakefield and Associates |
| 5:2023cv00134 |
| May 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Lexington Office |
| Danny C Reeves |
| P SO |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
JUDGMENT: 1) Pla's #1 Complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice. 2) This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the docket. 3) This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 06/21/2023. (DC) cc: COR and Guy Christopher Mannino by US Mail
|
|
Filing 10
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Pla's #7 MOTION for Extension of Time is DENIED. 2) Pla's #8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. 3) Pla's #1 Complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice. 4) This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the docket. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 06/21/2023. (DC) cc: COR and Guy Christopher Mannino by US Mail
|
|
Filing 9
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Guy Christopher Mannino, pro se (KMP)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Guy Christopher Mannino, pro seMotions referred to P SO. (KMP)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Extension of Time by Guy Christopher Mannino, pro se Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 envelope dated 6/8/2023)(KMP)
|
|
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time by Guy Christopher Mannino, #8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Guy Christopher Mannino (KMP)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: 1. Clerk mark assigned forms w/ case number and send to plaintiff; 2. Pla must complain w/ the requirements; 3. Filing fee required; 4. Pla on notice that failure to submit forms or pay fee w/in 30 days, the case will be dismissed. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 05/16/2023. (DC) cc: COR and Guy Christopher Mannino by US Mail (Order + Forms)
|
|
Filing 5
IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail with copy of docket sheet (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(KM)
|
|
Filing 3
CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Arkansas Eastern. Case number 2:23-cv-00076. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to immediately transfer Plaintiff's entire case file to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 05/09/2023. (llg) [Transferred from ared on 5/9/2023.]
|
|
Conflict Check run. (KM)
|
|
***FILE SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: #1 Complaint (KM)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Guy Christopher Mannino. (ldb) [Transferred from ared on 5/9/2023.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
