Chaney v. Dollar General Corporation
Plaintiff: Rose Chaney
Defendant: Dollar General Corporation and Dollar General Partners
Case Number: 5:2023cv00200
Filed: June 30, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Danny C Reeves
Referring Judge: Matthew A Stinnett
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: 1. w/in 14 days, parties shall exchange Rule 26(a)(1) info; 2. NLT 1/5/2024, ptff to disclose identity of expert witnesses. Def shall disclose NLT 2/23/2024; 3. Supplementation under Rule 26(e) due w/in 30 days of discovery of new info, nlt 30 days prior to close of discovery; 4. NLT 3/29/2024, parties to complete all discovery; 5. Parties to agree to max number of interrogatories allowed to be propounded; 6. Parties to agree to max number of requests for production of documents allowed to be propounded; 7. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(b)(1)(A), all discovery disputes referred to USMJ by random draw (Judge Matthew Stinnett drawn); 8. All motions for ext of time shall be referred to the undersigned; 9. Parties may not, by agreement, extend any deadlines set forth in this Scheduling Order; 10. Parties shall file any motion to amend pleadings and/or join addt'l parties NLT 11/1/2023; 11. NLT 4/29/2024, parties shall file all dispositive and daubert motions; 12. NLT 8/27/2024, counsel shall submit pretrial filings to Court's chambers and provide to opposing counsel; 13. NLT 8/27/2024, counsel shall pre-mark and number all exhibits; 14. NLT 8/27/2024, counsel shall file w/ the Clerk and submit to the Court, Agreed Proposed Jury Instructions; 15. NLT 9/3/2024, counsel shall file w/ the Clerk, submit to the Court and provide to opposing counsel any objections to the use of depositions or to the admissibility of exhibits; 16. Pretrial filings may be submitted to undersigned's email; 17. NLT 9/3/2024 parties shall submit copy of each exhibit to Court's chambers; 18. JURY TRIAL set for 9/17/2024 at 09:00 AM in LEXINGTON before Judge Danny C. Reeves; 19. Parties shall request a pretrial conference if desired; 20. Parties directed to file a joint status report the first Monday of each month; 21. Parties directed to use services of private mediator, if needed. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 8/22/2023. (KMP) cc: COR,D,JC
August 18, 2023 Opinion or Order ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Danny C. Reeves for review: #6 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (KCF)
August 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Owen, Joshua)
August 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE by Dollar General Partners OF SERVICE (Owen, Joshua)
July 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: ORDERED as follows: (1) Clerk of the Court is directed to TERMINATE dft Dollar General Corporation and SUBSTITUTE dft Dollar General Partners as properly named dft; (2) W/in 30 days, parties shall conduct meeting to discuss the possibilities for a settlement or resolution of this case; (3) At the time of the meeting, parties shall exchange disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1); (4) W/in 14 days of the meeting, counsel parties shall file a joint report outlining the proposed discovery plan In proposing deadlines, parties should contemplate a trial date w/in 12 months or fewer. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 07/05/2023. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Consent to Magistrate Judge)(KCF)cc: COR
June 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Dollar General Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Dollar General Partners, Corporate Parent DG Promotions, Inc., Corporate Parent DG Strategic VI, LLC for Dollar General Corporation.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Diversity Disclosure Statement)(KCF)
June 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Fayette Circuit Court, case number 22-CI-03725. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5592672), filed by Dollar General Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Complaint, #2 Exhibit B. Pl Supp Answers Interrog/RPD, #3 Exhibit C. Pl Answers to Interrog/RPD, #4 Exhibit D. State Court Record, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(KCF)
June 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Conflict Check run. (KCF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chaney v. Dollar General Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rose Chaney
Represented By: Glenn Martin Hammond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dollar General Corporation
Represented By: Joshua Justice Owen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dollar General Partners
Represented By: Joshua Justice Owen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?