Morgan v. Crickmer
Plaintiff: Arlus David Wade Morgan
Defendant: Doug Crickmer
Case Number: 5:2023cv00237
Filed: August 10, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
Presiding Judge: P SO
Referring Judge: Gregory F VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 JUDGMENT: 1) Pla's #1 Complaint DISMISSED. 2) Action STRICKEN from the Court's docket. 3) This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment, and there is no cause for delay. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 08/31/2023. (DC) cc: COR and Arlus David Wade Morgan by US Mail
August 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Morgan's #1 Complaint DISMISSED. 2) Action STRICKEN from the Court's docket. 3) Court will enter a Judgment. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 08/31/2023. (DC) cc: COR and Arlus David Wade Morgan by US Mail
August 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: 1) Pla's #10 Motion to proceed IFP is GRANTED. Administrative fee WAIVED. 2) Pla required to pay filing fee. a) Initial partial filing fee not required; b) Clerk open account; Send 525 Form and copy of this order to the Warden of the institution where Morgan is confined. c) Monthly payments; 3) Change of address must be informed in writing. 4) Matter stands submitted for initial screening. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 08/23/2023. (DC) cc: COR and Arlus David Wade Morgan by US Mail ( Order + Form)
August 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Arlus David Wade Morgan, pro se. (KCF)
August 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Arlus David Wade Morgan, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Envelope PM 8-21-23)(KCF)
August 24, 2023 Opinion or Order ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Arlus David Wade Morgan, pro se. (KCF)
August 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: 1. Morgan's #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice; 2. Clerk send Morgan AO 240 and EDKy 523 forms; 3. w/in 30 days, Morgan pay filing fee in full, or complete and file forms; 4. If Morgan fails to complay, Court will dismiss case w/out prejudice. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 8/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 AO 240, #2 EDKy 523) (STC)cc: COR and Arlus David Wade Morgan by US Mail
August 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: Arlus David Wade Morgan via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(KM)
August 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Kentucky Western. Case number 3:23-cv-00386. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. cc: Arlus David Wade Morgan w/docket sheet. Modified on 8/10/2023 (KM).
August 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 8/9/23: IT IS ORDERED that the instant action shall be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Central Division at Lexington, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a) for all further proceedings. All further filings shall be filed with that court. Should any filings in this action be filed in this Court in the future, the Clerk of Court shall transfer the filings to the Eastern District of Kentucky. cc: Plaintiff(pro se) (DJT) [Transferred from kywd on 8/10/2023.]
August 10, 2023 Opinion or Order ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (KM)
August 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Conflict Check run. (KM)
July 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Arlus David Wade Morgan (MNM) [Transferred from kywd on 8/10/2023.]
July 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Arlus David Wade Morgan (MNM) [Transferred from kywd on 8/10/2023.]
July 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. (MNM) [Transferred from kywd on 8/10/2023.]
July 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Doug Crickmer, filed by Arlus David Wade Morgan. (Attachments: #1 Summons Tendered) (MNM) [Transferred from kywd on 8/10/2023.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morgan v. Crickmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arlus David Wade Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doug Crickmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?