Caudill v. Centene Corporation
Plaintiff: Melissa Caudill
Defendant: Centene Corporation
Case Number: 5:2023cv00252
Filed: September 5, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Matthew A Stinnett
Referring Judge: Robert E Wier
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: The Court DISMISSES this matter with prejudice and STRIKES the matter from the Court's active docket. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 11/02/23.(JLM)cc: COR
November 2, 2023 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Robert E. Wier for review: #9 Stipulation of Dismissal (JLM)
November 1, 2023 Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Melissa Caudill. (Wiest, Christopher)
October 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: The parties are to file a proper Rule 41 stipulation or Agreed Order or, failing those, a status report explaining any delay in effectuating their settlement, by no later than November 4, 2023. The Court further GRANTS Defendant's request and SETS ASIDE all pending deadlines in this action. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 10/04/23.(JLM)cc: COR
October 2, 2023 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Robert E. Wier for review: #7 Notice of Settlement (JLM)
October 2, 2023 Attorney Update. Attorney J. Andrew Inman for Centene Corporation added. (JLM)
October 1, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement by Centene Corporation (Inman, J.)
September 20, 2023 Filing 6 Summons Returned Executed by Melissa Caudill as to Centene Corporation served on 9/11/2023, answer due 10/2/2023. (Wiest, Christopher)
September 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND REFERRAL ORDER: 1. At the outset, the Court reminds the parties that, under Rule 1, they share with the Court the duty to construe, administer, and employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action; 2. Pursuant to 28:636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court refers this case to the appropriate United States Magistrate Judge for this Division; 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court retains for decision any motion dispositive of a claim or defense (as well as motions regulating the trial proof, including Daubert and motions in limine); 4. Concurrent with the filing of any Rule 12 motion, the moving party may file, as a separate motion, any request for a discovery stay pending resolution. The Court refers consideration of any such motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge; 5. Discovery Disputes shall be resolved as defined within this order; The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter this Standing Order in the undersigned's civil cases excepting Social Security, pro se, and prisoner post-conviction matters at case opening (or as the Court otherwise directs). Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 11/19/2019. (KMP) cc: COR
September 6, 2023 Conflict Check run. (KMP)
September 5, 2023 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Centene Corporation and returned to counsel electronically for service. (KMP)
September 5, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5643216), filed by Melissa Caudill. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- 9/1/2021 Religious Accommodation Request, #2 Exhibit B- 9/19/2021 Email, #3 Exhibit C- 9/29/2021 Email, #4 Exhibit D- 10/6/2021 Email, #5 Exhibit E- 10/11/2021 Email, #6 Exhibit F- 10/20/2021 Email, #7 Exhibit G- 11/20/2021 Email, #8 Exhibit H- EEOC Charge, #9 Exhibit I- EEOC Right to Sue, #10 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Summons)(KMP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Caudill v. Centene Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Caudill
Represented By: Christopher David Wiest
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Centene Corporation
Represented By: J. Andrew Inman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?