Codell v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff: David W. Codell
Defendant: Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
Case Number: 5:2023cv00267
Filed: September 22, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Karen K Caldwell
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2023 Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by David W. Codell filed by Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A-Fagan Declaration, #2 Appendix B-Roth opinion, #3 Appendix C-McMurtry opinion, #4 Appendix D-Secty of State record, #5 Proposed Order)(Turner, Ann)
October 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER STAYING SCHEDULING ORDER: The #5 Scheduling Order is STAYED. W/in 14 days of the Court's resolution of Pla's #6 Motion to Remand, the parties will confer and submit a joint schedule for resolution of this matter. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 10/23/2023. (DC) cc: COR
October 20, 2023 Filing 7 Proposed Agreed Order Saying Schedule Pending Motion to Remand by David W. Codell. (Grabhorn, Andrew) Modified Filers on 10/23/2023 (DC).
October 20, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by David W. Codell (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Grabhorn, Andrew)
September 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: 1. NLT 30 days from entry of this order, parties shall confer & file a written joint report regarding standard of review; 2. NLT 60 days from the entry of this order, plaintiff shall file motion for judgment; 3. NTL 30 days after filing of motion, defendant shall file response; 4. NLT 15 days after filing of response, plaintiff may file a reply. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 9/27/2023.(KM)cc: COR
September 26, 2023 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company.(Turner, Ann)
September 26, 2023 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Karen K. Caldwell for review: #4 Answer to Complaint. (DC)
September 22, 2023 Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Unum Group, Other Affiliate Vanguard Group, Inc., Other Affiliate BlackRock, Inc. for Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company.. (KMP)
September 22, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Clark Circuit Court, case number 23-CI-360. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5656693), filed by Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KMP)
September 22, 2023 Conflict Check run. (KMP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Codell v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David W. Codell
Represented By: Andrew M. Grabhorn
Represented By: Michael D. Grabhorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
Represented By: Ann Michelle Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?