Stamper, Jr. v. SSA
Elmer Stamper, Jr. |
Commissioner of SSA |
5:2023cv00322 |
November 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Danny C Reeves |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of HHS Decision |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Danny C. Reeves for review: re #14 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Attorney Fees by Elmer Stamper, Jr. (JLM) |
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #14 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Attorney Fees by Elmer Stamper, Jr. filed by Elmer Stamper, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Fee Agreement and Assignment, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Statement of Time)(Dunn, Jennifer) |
Filing 14 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Attorney Fees by Elmer Stamper, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dunn, Jennifer) |
Filing 13 JUDGMENT: 1. The final administrative decision of the Defendant is REVERSED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for further administrative proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 2. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 1/16/24.(JLM)cc: COR |
Filing 12 ORDER: granting #11 Motion to Remand to Agency. The Social Security Administration's decision in this matter is REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 1/16/24. (JLM)cc: COR |
Filing 11 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Remand to Agency by Commissioner of SSA (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Muir, Chad) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Commissioner of SSA. (Attachments: #1 Administrative Transcript - Social Security, #2 Administrative Transcript - Social Security, #3 Administrative Transcript - Social Security, #4 Administrative Transcript - Social Security, #5 Administrative Transcript - Social Security, #6 Administrative Transcript - Social Security, #7 Administrative Transcript - Social Security, #8 Administrative Transcript - Social Security)(Morgan, Cheryl) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Commissioner of SSA. (Muir, Chad) |
Filing 8 NOTICE by Elmer Stamper, Jr. Joint Consent to Magistrate Judge (Dunn, Jennifer) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Danny C. Reeves for review: #8 Notice (JLM) |
Filing 7 ORDER: granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Jennifer L. DunnSigned by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 11/22/2023. (KCF)cc: COR |
Filing 6 MOTION for Jennifer L. Dunn to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Elmer Stamper, Jr. ( Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5703603) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Proposed Order)(Sullenger, D.) |
BAR STATUS Check completed as to Jennifer L. Dunn re #6 MOTION for Jennifer L. Dunn to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Elmer Stamper, Jr. (Filing fee $125; receipt number AKYEDC-5703603). (KM) |
Filing 5 ORDER: granting #4 Pltff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 11/20/23. (JLM)cc: COR |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Elmer Stamper, Jr. (KCF) |
Filing 3 GENERAL ORDER 22-15: STANDING PROCEDURES GOVERNING FILINGS, BRIEFING, AND RESOLUTION OF ACTIONS: 1. An action is commenced upon filing of the complaint. 2. Clerk to notify Commissioner of Social Security and the U.S. Attorney via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). 3. Answer to the complaint must be served within 60 days of notice of the action as outlined in (2) above. 4. FRCP 12 motions due within 60 days of notice of action as outlined in (2) above. 5. Action is presented for decision by parties briefs. (a) Plaintiffs Brief is due 30 days after the answer is filed OR within 30 days after entry of an order disposing of the last remaining motion under paragraph (4) above. (b) Commissioners Brief due within 30 days after service of Plaintiffs Brief. (c) Plaintiff's Reply brief due within 14 days after service of Commissioners Brief. 6. Extensions of time, page limitations or permissions to file additional briefs may be granted for good cause shown. 7. Except as otherwise provided motion practice shall be governed by LR 7.1. 8. Clerk directed to file this General Order in all actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 9. On December 1, 2022, this General Order shall supersede General Order 13-17. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves. CC: COR.(KCF) |
Conflict Check run. (KCF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (No Process Necessary), filed by Elmer Stamper, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KCF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stamper, Jr. v. SSA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Elmer Stamper, Jr. | |
Represented By: | D. Wes Sullenger |
Represented By: | Jennifer L. Dunn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA | |
Represented By: | Cheryl D. Morgan, AUSA |
Represented By: | Chad Muir, DOJ |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.