Lewis v. Elliott
| Tucker Lewis |
| Jailer Kelli Elliott |
| 5:2024cv00010 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Danny C Reeves |
| Candace J Smith |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Tucker Lewis, pro se. IT IS RECOMMENDED that:1. Petitioner's 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and comply with Court orders;2. This matter be STRICKEN from the active docket of this court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith on 02/28/2024.(KCF)cc: CORand Tucker Lewis by US Mail
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER:1. The Clerk of Court shall mark the instant case number on forms and send to Petitioner; 2. NLT 30 days from the date of this Order, the same being 2/15/24, Petitioner shall complete the proper form to proceed with a case under 28 U.S.C. 2254, that is an AO Form 241, and return to the clerk for filing. In addition, also by 2/15/24, Petitioner must either pay the $5 filing fee, or complete AO Form 240 and EDKY Form 523 and return for filing;3. Petitioner is hereby on notice that if he fails to file required forms, it will be presumed he does not wish to proceed with a case;4. The Clerk of Court shall submit the file to the undersigned for further proceedings upon Petitioner's filing of completed forms and either his payment in full or his filing of AO Form 240 and EDKY Form 523, or upon expiration of the deadline for making such filings, whichever first occurs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith on 1/16/2024.(KCF)cc: CORand Tucker Lewis by US Mail
|
|
Filing 3
IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(KMP)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Tucker Lewis. No filing fee or IFP documentation received. (Attachments: #1 Envelope dated 1/8/2024)(KMP)
|
|
Conflict Check run. (KMP)
|
|
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Candace J. Smith for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (KMP)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lewis v. Elliott | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tucker Lewis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jailer Kelli Elliott | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
