Williams v. Eastern Kentucky University
Plaintiff: Keisha Williams
Defendant: Eastern Kentucky University
Case Number: 5:2024cv00019
Filed: January 23, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Danny C Reeves
Referring Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Defendant Eastern Kentucky University's partial motion to dismiss #9 is GRANTED.Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 03/18/2024.(KCF)cc: CORand Keisha Williams by US Mail
March 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT:1. W/in 30 days, counsel to conduct meeting of parties required by Rule 26(f);2. At time of meeting, counsel for parties shall exchange disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1) and in the future, make supplemental disclosures when required by Rule 26(e);3. W/in 14 days after the meeting, counsel to file a written joint report outlining the proposed discovery plan. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 03/18/2024.(KCF)cc: CORand Keisha Williams by US Mail (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/18/2024: #1 Consent to MJ) (KCF).
February 19, 2024 Opinion or Order ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Danny C. Reeves for review: #10 Answer to Complaint (KCF)
February 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Eastern Kentucky University.(Iaccarino, Carmine)
February 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Eastern Kentucky University (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Iaccarino, Carmine)
February 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN to Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt)(KCF)
January 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Eastern Kentucky University and delivered to U.S. Marshal with a completed USM-285 form and service packet for each defendant to be served. (Attachments: #1 Receipt) (KMP)
January 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: 1. Williams's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #5 is GRANTED and payment of the filing and administrative fees in this case is WAIVED; 2. A Deputy Clerk is directed to prepare one "Service Packet" for service upon Defendant Eastern Kentucky University; 3. The Deputy Clerk is further directed to send the Service Packet to the USMS and note the date of delivery on the docket; 4. The USMS is directed to serve Defendant EKU by sending the Service Packet by certified mail; 5. Once service is complete, Def EKU must answer the Compliant in accordance w/ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 6. Williams must immediately advise the Clerk's Office, in writing, of any change in her mailing address. Failure to comply will result in dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 1/26/2024. Service Packet emailed to USMS on this date. (KMP) cc: COR and Keisha Williams by US Mail.
January 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Case no longer referred to P SO per Chambers. (JLM)
January 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Keisha Williams, pro se.Motions referred to P SO. (KCF)
January 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER re: Disclosure of Contact Information: 1. pro se litigants must provide current telephone number, residential address, & if different, mailing address. 2. pro se litigants must provide written notice of change of residential address, & if different, mailing address. 3. Clerk file copy of Order in all non-prisoner pro se actions. Failure to provide required information or change of address may result in appropriate sanctions. (KCF)cc: CORand Keisha Williams by US Mail
January 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(KCF)
January 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT (NO PROCESS REQUESTED)., filed by Keisha Williams, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Supporting Documents)(KCF)
January 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Conflict Check run. (KCF)
January 23, 2024 Opinion or Order ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Complaint, ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Keisha Williams (KCF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Eastern Kentucky University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keisha Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eastern Kentucky University
Represented By: Carmine G. Iaccarino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?